New York Taxpayers Foot Bill for State's Bills Game Suite

Hospitality suite at Buffalo Bills games costs up to $20,000 per game, paid for by state funds.

Published on Feb. 12, 2026

New York state taxpayers are footing the bill for a luxury suite at Buffalo Bills games, which can cost up to $20,000 per game. The suite, called the 'I Love NY Hospitality Suite', is used by state officials and guests, with records showing over 140 people have used the suite. While the state claims the suite is used to 'develop relationships with companies in support of furthering economic development', critics argue it is an excessive use of taxpayer money.

Why it matters

The use of taxpayer funds for a luxury suite at sporting events has raised concerns about government spending and whether this is an appropriate use of public money, especially given New York's fiscal challenges. There are questions about the true purpose of the suite and whether the state is getting value for the significant cost.

The details

The 'I Love NY Hospitality Suite' at Buffalo Bills games can cost up to $20,000 per game. Records show over 140 people have used the suite, including the Governor of New York. The state claims the suite is used to 'develop relationships with companies in support of furthering economic development', but critics argue this is an excessive use of taxpayer funds, especially given the high cost.

  • The 'I Love NY Hospitality Suite' has been used by New York state officials at Buffalo Bills games for multiple seasons.

The players

Kathy Hochul

The Governor of New York, who has attended multiple Buffalo Bills games in the state's luxury suite.

Empire State Development

The state agency that oversees the 'I Love NY Hospitality Suite' at Buffalo Bills games.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The state legislature may investigate the use of taxpayer funds for the luxury suite and whether it represents an appropriate use of public money.

The takeaway

This case highlights concerns about government spending on luxury amenities, especially when the true purpose and value to taxpayers is unclear. It raises questions about fiscal responsibility and whether state resources could be better utilized to address more pressing needs.