Democrats Seek to Regain Voter Trust After Losses

Readers offer suggestions for a 2028 Democratic platform to address party's credibility issues

Published on Feb. 10, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

In response to a column outlining a hypothetical 2028 Democratic platform, readers provided hundreds of suggestions on how the party can restore its credibility and public respect after a decade of declining trust. While some praised the platform's focus on moderation, others argued for more radical approaches. Key issues raised include climate change, abortion rights, judicial reform, and addressing the legacy of the Trump administration.

Why it matters

The Democratic Party faces an uphill battle to regain the confidence of voters who have grown wary of the party's perceived excesses and ideological extremes. Rebuilding that trust is essential for the party to govern effectively and win elections in the long run.

The details

Readers offered a range of perspectives on the hypothetical 2028 Democratic platform. Some praised its focus on restoring the party's credibility, while others argued for more transformative policies. Key issues raised include the need for detailed proposals on climate change, abortion rights, court reform, and addressing the Trump administration's legacy. There was also discussion around incorporating themes of patriotism and religion, which some see as important for appealing to moderate voters.

  • The 2024 election and its aftermath were 'loud and clear warnings' to the Democratic Party about its damaged relationship with the electorate.
  • A Wall Street Journal poll published on January 16, 2026 found that even with Trump viewed negatively, voters preferred congressional Republicans over Democrats on key issues.

The players

Thomas B. Edsall

The author of the original column outlining a hypothetical 2028 Democratic platform.

Majora

A commenter who argued that the platform should propose more radical approaches to address the nation's problems and win back disillusioned voters.

Jim Kessler

The executive vice president for policy of Third Way, a centrist Democratic think tank, who provided suggestions for the platform that were ultimately omitted.

Susan from Massachusetts

A reader who called for serious reform of the Supreme Court, which she said has 'decided to legislate from the bench.'

Richard Pildes

A law professor at NYU who provided insights on the challenges of reforming the Supreme Court, including the feasibility of term limits and expanding the number of justices.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Instead, Majora continued,”

— Majora (nytimes.com)

“We need serious reform for the Supreme Court, which has decided to legislate from the bench. Without reform, this Supreme Court will nullify most of what the Democratic Party tries to do.”

— Susan, from Massachusetts (nytimes.com)

“Most constitutional scholars believe Congress can do this through legislation. The Constitution establishes life tenure, but it does not fix the size of the court.”

— Richard Pildes, law professor at N.Y.U. (nytimes.com)

“Haidt's stands out because it names the problem Democrats avoid confronting”

— Reuben, from Australia (nytimes.com)

“the positions expressed cannot be construed by voters on the fence as supporting discrimination in any direction.”

— Roy Hoffinger, lawyer in San Diego (nytimes.com)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.