Babcock & Wilcox Investors Seek Lead Plaintiff in Class Action Lawsuit

Lawsuit alleges company misled investors about relationship with largest shareholder and counterparty

Apr. 15, 2026 at 7:34pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A high-end, photorealistic studio still-life photograph featuring a polished metal gear, a stack of financial documents, and a sleek black smartphone arranged elegantly on a clean, monochromatic background, conceptually representing the abstract corporate strategy and finance behind Babcock & Wilcox's business dealings.A minimalist studio still life captures the complex financial and strategic considerations behind Babcock & Wilcox's major power generation contract.San Diego Today

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP has announced that purchasers or acquirers of Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. securities between November 5, 2025 and March 11, 2026 have until June 15, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit against the company. The lawsuit alleges that Babcock & Wilcox and its executives made false and misleading statements about the company's business and financial prospects, including its relationship with its largest shareholder and a counterparty to a major contract.

Why it matters

This lawsuit highlights concerns about potential conflicts of interest and lack of transparency in Babcock & Wilcox's business dealings. The allegations, if proven, could have significant financial and reputational consequences for the company.

The details

The lawsuit, captioned Cho v. Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc., alleges that Babcock & Wilcox failed to disclose that its largest shareholder, BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (BRC), stood on both sides of a $2.4 billion power generation contract with an independent power producer called Base Electron. The lawsuit also alleges that Babcock & Wilcox's counterparty, Applied Digital Corporation, did not actually need the products and services that Babcock & Wilcox was supposed to provide under the contract.

  • On November 4, 2025, Babcock & Wilcox announced it had entered an agreement for a limited notice to proceed on a power generation project.
  • On March 4, 2026, Babcock & Wilcox announced it had received full notice to proceed on a $2.4 billion design-build agreement with Base Electron.
  • On March 12, 2026, Wolfpack Research published a short report alleging that Babcock & Wilcox had failed to disclose the close relationship between its largest shareholder, BRC, and Base Electron.

The players

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.

A provider of energy and emissions control solutions to industrial, electrical utility, municipal, and other customers.

BRC Group Holdings, Inc.

Babcock & Wilcox's largest shareholder, which allegedly stood on both sides of the $2.4 billion power generation contract with Base Electron.

Applied Digital Corporation

The company that allegedly did not need the products and services that Babcock & Wilcox was supposed to provide under the power generation contract.

Base Electron

The independent power producer that entered into the $2.4 billion design-build agreement with Babcock & Wilcox, which allegedly had close ties to Babcock & Wilcox's largest shareholder, BRC.

Wolfpack Research

The firm that published a short report alleging that Babcock & Wilcox had failed to disclose the close relationship between its largest shareholder, BRC, and Base Electron.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Babcock & Wilcox has failed to disclose the close relationship between its largest shareholder, BRC, and Base Electron, Babcock & Wilcox's counterparty to the Power Generation Contract. Base Electron's directors included BRC Co-CEO and Chairman Riley, and Base Electron's registered address matched that of BRC's headquarters, not Applied Digital's.”

— Wolfpack Research

What’s next

Investors who purchased or acquired Babcock & Wilcox securities during the Class Period have until June 15, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit.

The takeaway

This case highlights the importance of transparency and disclosure in corporate transactions, particularly when there are potential conflicts of interest or related-party dealings. Investors will be closely watching the outcome of this lawsuit and its implications for Babcock & Wilcox's business and reputation.