- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
California City Today
By the People, for the People
U.S. Appeals Court Revives $3 Billion Patent Lawsuit Against Intel
VLSI Technology's long-running case against Intel over CPU frequency technology is headed back to court after a previous dismissal was overturned.
Apr. 16, 2026 at 1:19pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The complex legal battle over semiconductor patents highlights the high-stakes nature of intellectual property disputes in the tech industry.California City TodayA U.S. appeals court has reopened a $3 billion patent infringement lawsuit filed by VLSI Technology against Intel. The case, originally filed in 2017, was previously dismissed by a district court judge in 2024, but the appeals court has now set aside that decision and ordered the dispute to go back to a jury trial.
Why it matters
This long-running legal battle between VLSI and Intel over CPU frequency measurement technology is significant because it involves a massive potential payout and could set important precedents around patent licensing and infringement claims in the semiconductor industry.
The details
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit determined that the case was not suitable for summary judgment and must be evaluated by a jury. While the appeals court supported the exclusion of VLSI's original damages expert, the company can still pursue damages through another expert. The key issues at stake include whether Intel's processors infringed on VLSI's '836 patent, the scope of that patent, and the extent of any damages owed.
- The original lawsuit was filed by VLSI in California in 2017.
- In 2024, a district court judge ruled in favor of Intel, concluding its processors did not infringe on VLSI's patent.
- This week, the U.S. appeals court set aside the 2024 decision and ordered the case to return to district court for a jury trial.
The players
VLSI Technology
A semiconductor company that has filed multiple patent infringement lawsuits against Intel, alleging violations of 19 patents originally developed by Freescale, NXP, and SigmaTel.
Intel
The world's largest semiconductor chip maker, which is defending itself against VLSI's patent infringement claims.
Fortress Investment Group
The private equity firm that controls VLSI Technology and is at the center of the legal dispute with Intel.
Mubadala Investment Company
The sovereign wealth fund that acquired a controlling interest in Fortress Investment Group from SoftBank Group in 2024.
What they’re saying
“The current ruling does not determine liability, but it substantially shifts the case as Intel loses early dismissal, and the dispute returns to a jury.”
— Anton Shilov, Author
What’s next
The case will now return to the district court for a jury trial, where VLSI will have the opportunity to present its infringement arguments and pursue damages against Intel.
The takeaway
This long-running legal battle between VLSI and Intel highlights the complex and high-stakes nature of patent disputes in the semiconductor industry. The reversal of the previous dismissal means Intel will have to defend itself against VLSI's claims in court, potentially facing significant financial liability if the jury finds in VLSI's favor.

