- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
California City Today
By the People, for the People
Apple Seeks Court Order to Compel YouTuber Jon Prosser's Cooperation in Trade Secrets Lawsuit
Prosser still failing to fully respond to Apple's discovery requests, while co-defendant Ramacciotti is cooperating.
Apr. 14, 2026 at 1:57pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
As tech giants battle to protect their intellectual property, the high-stakes fight over confidential data and trade secrets continues to unfold behind the scenes.California City TodayA joint status report filed in Apple's trade secrets lawsuit against YouTuber Jon Prosser and Michael Ramacciotti shows Prosser is still failing to comply with discovery, prompting Apple to seek a court order to force his cooperation. Meanwhile, Ramacciotti has been more forthcoming, allowing forensic review of a device and offering to sit for a deposition.
Why it matters
The case highlights the challenges tech companies face in protecting their intellectual property against leaks, especially from influential social media personalities. Apple is seeking to recoup damages and prevent further disclosure of its confidential information.
The details
Apple served Prosser with document and deposition subpoenas in February 2026, but he has failed to fully respond to certain requests and not responded at all to others. Apple has extended his deadline multiple times but still lacks the limited discovery it needs. Prosser has indicated he plans to retain counsel and try to set aside the default judgment entered against him in October 2025 after he missed the court deadline to respond to Apple's complaint.
- In July 2025, Apple filed the lawsuit accusing Prosser and Ramacciotti of misappropriating trade secrets.
- In October 2025, a default judgment was entered against Prosser after he missed the court deadline to respond to Apple's complaint.
- On February 3, 2026, Apple served Prosser with document and deposition subpoenas.
- The parties have scheduled a further status update with the court for June 10, 2026.
The players
Jon Prosser
A YouTuber accused by Apple of misappropriating trade secrets and failing to comply with discovery requests in the lawsuit.
Michael Ramacciotti
Co-defendant in the lawsuit who has been more cooperative, allowing forensic review of a device and offering to sit for a deposition.
Ethan Lipnik
A former Apple software engineer who was terminated for failing to follow policies for securing a development iPhone that was accessed by Ramacciotti.
Apple Inc.
The tech giant that filed the lawsuit against Prosser and Ramacciotti, accusing them of misappropriating trade secrets related to iOS 26.
What they’re saying
“I've been in active communications with Apple since the beginning stages of this case.”
— Jon Prosser
What’s next
Apple intends to file a Motion for an Order to Show Cause in the Northern District of Ohio to force Prosser's compliance with the discovery requests.
The takeaway
This case highlights the ongoing challenges tech companies face in protecting their intellectual property, especially when dealing with influential social media personalities who may have access to confidential information. Apple's pursuit of this lawsuit demonstrates its commitment to safeguarding its trade secrets, even against high-profile defendants.


