- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Chili Debate Rages On: Beans or No Beans?
The internet can't agree on whether beans belong in chili.
Published on Feb. 4, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The age-old debate over whether beans should be included in chili has resurfaced, with passionate arguments on both sides. While some insist that "real chili" never contains beans, others argue that beans are an essential part of the dish. Delish editors weigh in, noting that the inclusion of beans often depends on regional preferences and how the chili is being served.
Why it matters
The beans in chili debate is a longstanding dispute that speaks to the regional and personal preferences around this classic dish. As a Super Bowl staple, the way chili is prepared can be a point of contention among fans and cooks alike.
The details
Delish's social media posts on the topic elicited a range of responses, from "no beans, no chili" to "real chili never has beans." The Delish team is divided, with some editors believing beans are essential for texture, while others say beans change the dish entirely, turning it into "chili bean soup" rather than standalone chili. The debate also has regional dimensions, with a "traditional 'Texas Red'" chili containing no beans, while in Cincinnati, chili is often served over spaghetti with beans as an optional topping. For New Mexicans, "chile" (with an "e") is more of a gravy, served with beans on the side.
- The Delish article was published on February 5, 2026, just ahead of the Super Bowl.
The players
Taylor Worden
Delish's Digital Culinary Editor, who believes beans are an essential part of great chili recipes.
Katelyn Lunders
Delish's Digital Director, who says beans make chili better as a meal on its own, but not necessarily as a topping.
Jillian Elliott
Delish's Editorial Assistant, who notes that a "traditional 'Texas Red'" chili contains chunks of beef and no beans.
Alison Dominguez
Delish's Designer, who says that in New Mexico, "chile" (with an "e") is more of a gravy, served with beans on the side.
Catherine Sillars
Delish's Social Video Producer, who consulted the official judging criteria for the World Champion Chili Cook-Off, which has categories that both ban and require beans.
What they’re saying
“No beans, no chili. It's the best part in my opinion and really gives chili the ideal texture.”
— Taylor Worden, Digital Culinary Editor (Delish)
“As a meal on its own, beans make chili so much better. As a topping on a hot dog or whatever vehicle you choose, different story.”
— Katelyn Lunders, Digital Director (Delish)
The takeaway
The beans in chili debate highlights the regional and personal preferences around this classic dish, as well as the fact that there is no single definitive way to make chili. Whether you prefer it with or without beans, chili remains a beloved Super Bowl staple that can be prepared in a variety of delicious ways.




