New Mexico Sues Meta Over Child Sexual Exploitation on Social Media

Trial focuses on Meta's alleged failure to disclose dangers of its platforms

Published on Feb. 9, 2026

The state of New Mexico is suing Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, over the dangers of child sexual exploitation on its social media platforms. The trial, which begins with opening statements on Monday, alleges that Meta's algorithms and account features enticed and addicted young people to its platforms, creating a 'breeding ground' for predators to target children. Prosecutors say they will provide evidence that Meta failed to disclose what it knew about these harmful effects, in violation of state consumer protection laws.

Why it matters

This trial is the first stand-alone case brought by state prosecutors against a major social media company over the harm caused to children on its platforms. It is likely to shine a spotlight on the issue of online child sexual exploitation and the responsibility of tech companies to protect vulnerable users.

The details

New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez sued Meta in 2023, building the case by posing as kids through social media accounts and documenting the arrival of sexual solicitations as well as Meta's response. Prosecutors allege that Meta's algorithms and account features enticed and addicted young people to its platforms, while also creating a 'breeding ground' for predators. They also claim that Meta failed to disclose what it knew about these harmful effects, in violation of state consumer protection laws.

  • The trial is set to start on Monday, February 9, 2026, with opening statements.

The players

Raúl Torrez

The Attorney General of New Mexico who filed the lawsuit against Meta.

Meta

The parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, which is being sued by the state of New Mexico over the dangers of child sexual exploitation on its social media platforms.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

The takeaway

This trial highlights the growing concerns around the responsibility of tech companies to protect children from online predators and the harmful effects of social media. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how states hold major platforms accountable for the dangers their products pose to vulnerable users.