- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Man Accused of Killing Conservative Activist Seeks to Ban Cameras from Court
Tyler Robinson claims media coverage is tainting potential jurors in his aggravated murder case.
Apr. 17, 2026 at 4:18am
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The intense media scrutiny and sensationalized coverage of this high-profile murder case threatens to undermine the judicial process.Billings TodayThe man accused of killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk is pushing for a judge to ban cameras from the courtroom, arguing that live broadcasts of the prosecution are violating his right to a fair trial. Tyler Robinson's attorneys claim biased media coverage is tainting potential jurors, citing examples like a New York Post story that suggested Robinson confessed during a court appearance.
Why it matters
The case has drawn intense media scrutiny, with outlets like the Daily Mail reporting inconclusive ballistics findings that led to speculation about Robinson's possible exoneration. Robinson's defense team is concerned that sensationalized coverage and 'vilification' of their client is compromising his right to a fair trial.
The details
Robinson, who turned 23 on Thursday, is facing the death penalty if convicted of the Sept. 10 shooting of Kirk, a conservative activist, on the Utah Valley University campus. Prosecutors say DNA evidence links Robinson to the crime, but his attorneys argue the forensic analysis is more complex. Robinson's attorneys are also seeking to delay his preliminary hearing, where prosecutors must show they have enough evidence to proceed to trial.
- Robinson is due in court on Friday to press his claims about biased media coverage.
- Robinson's preliminary hearing, where prosecutors must show they have enough evidence to proceed to trial, is scheduled for May.
The players
Tyler Robinson
The 23-year-old man accused of killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk
The conservative activist who was killed on Sept. 10 while addressing a crowd of thousands at the Utah Valley University campus in Orem.
Erika Kirk
The widow of Charlie Kirk.
Judge Tony Graf
The judge presiding over the case who has previously stopped livestreams and ordered camera operators to avoid filming the defendant.
Mike Judd
A lawyer representing a coalition of media organizations, including The Associated Press, that have been fighting to preserve access to the court proceedings.
What they’re saying
“'The predominant purpose being served by the live stream coverage has not been the educational reporting of the court proceedings, but rather advertising profit, sensationalism, political agendas, and, most prominently, the vilification of Mr. Robinson.'”
— Tyler Robinson's attorneys
“'The court can do all of that in order to try to control what gets fed into that media ecosystem. You reduce the likelihood of somebody publishing things that you think may be of potentially biasing concern later on.'”
— Mike Judd, Lawyer for media coalition
What’s next
Robinson's attorneys are seeking to delay his May preliminary hearing, when prosecutors must show they have enough evidence to proceed to trial. The judge will also rule on the defense's request to ban cameras from the courtroom.
The takeaway
This case highlights the challenges of balancing media access and transparency with ensuring a fair trial, as the intense media coverage and sensationalism around the killing of a prominent conservative figure threatens to undermine the judicial process.

