Gruden Seeks Over $150M in Lawsuit Against NFL

Former Raiders coach claims damages from forced resignation over leaked emails

Published on Feb. 6, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Former NFL coach Jon Gruden has filed a lawsuit against the league and Commissioner Roger Goodell, claiming his losses from his forced resignation from the Raiders 'total well over $150,000,000.' Gruden contends the emails that led to his ouster were leaked with the goal of terminating his employment.

Why it matters

Gruden's lawsuit against the NFL represents a high-profile legal battle over the league's handling of sensitive information and its power to force out coaches and executives. The case could have broader implications for how the NFL conducts internal investigations and disciplines personnel.

The details

In a court filing, Gruden's lawyers revealed the former Buccaneers and Raiders coach is seeking over $150 million in damages. This includes losses from his lost employment, interference with future job opportunities, contract value, sponsorships, reputational damage, and legal fees. Gruden filed the lawsuit about a month after resigning from the Raiders following the release of emails he had sent containing offensive language.

  • Gruden filed the lawsuit roughly a month after his forced resignation from the Raiders in October 2021.
  • The court filing was submitted on February 5, 2026.

The players

Jon Gruden

Former head coach of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and Oakland/Las Vegas Raiders who is suing the NFL and Commissioner Roger Goodell over his forced resignation.

Roger Goodell

Commissioner of the National Football League, named as a defendant in Gruden's lawsuit.

Daniel Snyder

Former owner of the Washington Commanders, whose investigation led to the release of emails that prompted Gruden's resignation.

Mark Davis

Owner of the Las Vegas Raiders, Gruden's former employer.

Jeff Pash

Former general counsel for the NFL, listed as a potential witness in Gruden's lawsuit.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident (San Francisco Chronicle)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.