Justice Jackson Criticizes Supreme Court's Pro-Trump Emergency Orders

Newest justice calls conservative colleagues' rulings 'scratch-paper musings' that ignore real-world impacts.

Apr. 16, 2026 at 12:51am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A dimly lit, cinematic painting of the Supreme Court building at dusk, with warm sunlight and deep shadows creating a sense of institutional solemnity and unease.The Supreme Court's increased use of emergency orders to advance controversial policies has raised concerns about the institution's impartiality and commitment to upholding the rule of law.Washington Today

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has delivered a sustained critique of her conservative colleagues' use of emergency orders to benefit the Trump administration, calling the orders 'scratch-paper musings' that can 'seem oblivious and thus ring hollow.' Jackson said the court has become less restrained in recent years, often intervening early in legal processes on divisive policy issues.

Why it matters

Jackson's public comments represent an unusual rebuke from a sitting justice, highlighting growing tensions on the court over its use of emergency orders to allow the implementation of controversial Trump administration policies before they are fully litigated. Her remarks suggest the court's liberal wing sees these orders as undermining the judicial process.

The details

In a lengthy speech at Yale Law School, Jackson said the court's emergency orders often provide only brief, superficial assessments of the legal issues at stake, without properly weighing the real-world impacts on people affected by the policies. She pushed back on the court's view that preventing the president from implementing a policy is also a harm that must be weighed. 'The president of the United States, though he may be harmed in an abstract way, he certainly isn't harmed if what he wants to do is illegal,' Jackson said.

  • Justice Jackson delivered her remarks on Monday, April 15, 2026 at Yale Law School.
  • Last week, Justice Sonia Sotomayor similarly criticized the court's emergency orders during an event at the University of Alabama.

The players

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson

The newest member of the Supreme Court, appointed by President Biden in 2023.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor

A liberal member of the Supreme Court who has also criticized the court's use of emergency orders.

President Donald Trump

The former president whose administration frequently sought emergency orders from the Supreme Court to implement controversial policies.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Those scratch-paper musings' be applied by lower courts in other cases.”

— Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Supreme Court Justice

“The president of the United States, though he may be harmed in an abstract way, he certainly isn't harmed if what he wants to do is illegal.”

— Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Supreme Court Justice

What’s next

Justice Jackson's comments suggest the court's liberal wing may continue to push back against the conservative majority's use of emergency orders, potentially leading to further public disagreements between the justices.

The takeaway

Justice Jackson's rare public rebuke of her conservative colleagues highlights the growing tensions on the Supreme Court over the use of emergency orders to advance controversial policies, underscoring concerns that the court is becoming increasingly partisan and interventionist on divisive political issues.