Judge Allows Security-Related Work on White House Ballroom

Ruling clarifies that below-ground construction and upgrades can proceed, but work on the ballroom itself remains blocked.

Apr. 16, 2026 at 10:18pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A quiet, cinematic painting of the partially obscured East Wing of the White House at dusk, with warm, diagonal sunlight and deep shadows creating a sense of political tension and uncertainty.As the White House undergoes security-related renovations, a legal battle continues over the administration's plans for a new ballroom.Washington Today

A federal judge has issued a revised ruling that allows security-related construction work to continue on the White House, including below-ground facilities and upgrades to protect the executive mansion. However, the judge maintained his previous order blocking construction on the planned 90,000-square-foot ballroom itself, stating that the Trump administration has not provided sufficient national security justification for the immediate installation of features like bulletproof windows and missile-resistant columns.

Why it matters

The White House ballroom project has been a source of controversy, with the National Trust for Historic Preservation filing a lawsuit to halt construction until a federal review process is completed. This latest ruling aims to balance national security concerns with the need for proper oversight and public input on major changes to the historic White House complex.

The details

In his revised order, Judge Richard Leon clarified that his initial ruling from March 31 would allow for 'below-ground construction of national security facilities, work necessary to provide for presidential security, and construction necessary to protect and secure the White House and the construction site itself.' However, the judge maintained that work on the ballroom itself cannot proceed without authorization from Congress. Leon warned the Trump administration that security concerns do not provide a 'blank check to proceed with otherwise unlawful activity,' and said the White House's claim that the ballroom is itself a security upgrade is 'incredible, if not disingenuous.'

  • On March 31, Judge Leon initially ruled that President Trump cannot build the planned ballroom without authorization from Congress.
  • On April 12, a D.C. Circuit appeals court panel directed Leon to clarify his initial ruling.
  • On April 16, Judge Leon issued his revised order, staying his ruling for another seven days to allow the White House to pursue further appeals.

The players

Judge Richard Leon

The federal judge presiding over the White House ballroom case.

President Donald Trump

The current President of the United States, who announced the construction of the 90,000-square-foot White House ballroom in late July 2025.

National Trust for Historic Preservation

The organization that filed a lawsuit in December 2025 seeking to stop the ballroom construction until the project completes the standard federal review process and the administration seeks public comment on the proposed changes to the White House.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“It is, to say the least, incredible, if not disingenuous, that Defendants now argue that my Order does not stop ballroom construction because of the safety-and-security exception!”

— Judge Richard Leon, Presiding Judge

“This highly political Judge, and his illegal overreach, is out of control, and costing our Nation greatly.”

— President Donald Trump

What’s next

The Trump administration has filed a notice of appeal to the D.C. Circuit court following Judge Leon's revised order. The judge's stay is now set to expire next Thursday, April 23, and he warned that 'any above-ground construction over the next seven days that is not in compliance with my Amended Order is at risk of being taken down pending the resolution of this case.'

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing tensions between the executive branch's claims of national security and the need for proper oversight and public input on major changes to the historic White House complex. The judge's ruling aims to balance those competing interests, allowing security-related work to proceed while maintaining restrictions on the controversial ballroom construction.