Pam Bondi Subpoenaed by Congress Over Epstein Files Coverup

Former Florida Attorney General faces contempt of Congress charges for refusing to testify about her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.

Apr. 14, 2026 at 7:19pm

A dimly lit government office or courtroom space, with warm sunlight streaming in through the windows and deep shadows obscuring details. The scene conveys a sense of political tension and unresolved scandal.The lingering shadows of the Epstein scandal cast a pall over the halls of power, as a former state attorney general defies a Congressional subpoena.Washington Today

Pam Bondi, the former Florida Attorney General, has been subpoenaed by a bipartisan Congressional committee to testify about her alleged mishandling of the Jeffrey Epstein case while in office. However, Bondi has refused to comply with the subpoena, prompting threats of contempt of Congress charges against her. The committee is investigating claims that Bondi's office minimized Epstein's crimes and provided special treatment to his associate Ghislaine Maxwell.

Why it matters

Bondi's actions as Florida Attorney General have come under intense scrutiny, with allegations that she used her office to protect powerful individuals like Donald Trump while pursuing political vendettas against his opponents. Her refusal to testify before Congress raises concerns about a potential coverup of the Epstein scandal and the continued influence of Trump's allies within the Justice Department.

The details

The House Committee on Government Oversight subpoenaed Bondi for a closed-door deposition, but the Department of Justice notified the committee that she would not be appearing, claiming the subpoena no longer applied since she is no longer the Attorney General. However, the committee maintains that the subpoena applies to Bondi personally, and they are prepared to pursue contempt of Congress charges if she continues to defy the order.

  • Bondi was subpoenaed by the House Committee on Government Oversight on April 12, 2026 to testify about the Epstein files.
  • Bondi was scheduled to appear for a deposition on April 14, 2026, but failed to show up.

The players

Pam Bondi

The former Attorney General of Florida who is accused of mishandling the Jeffrey Epstein case and providing special treatment to his associate Ghislaine Maxwell.

Rep. Robert Garcia

The ranking Democratic member of the House Committee on Government Oversight, who has vowed to pursue contempt of Congress charges against Bondi if she continues to defy the subpoena.

Donald Trump

The former President who appointed Bondi as one of his lawyers during his first impeachment trial and who Bondi has staunchly defended, even echoing his false claims of a stolen 2020 election.

Jeffrey Epstein

The wealthy serial pedophile whose crimes and connections to powerful individuals have been the subject of intense public scrutiny.

Ghislaine Maxwell

Epstein's convicted pimp who has been accused of receiving special treatment from the Trump administration.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“'Pam Bondi is evading a lawful congressional subpoena by failing to appear before the Oversight Committee for a deposition about the Epstein files and the White House cover-up. This subpoena applies to her regardless of her title. She must appear before the committee, and if she continues to ignore the law, Oversight Democrats will move forward with contempt proceedings immediately.'”

— Rep. Robert Garcia, Ranking Democrat, House Committee on Government Oversight

“'Lock her up! I love that.'”

— Pam Bondi, Former Florida Attorney General

What’s next

The House Committee on Government Oversight is expected to decide whether to pursue contempt of Congress charges against Pam Bondi if she continues to defy the subpoena and refuse to testify about her handling of the Epstein case.

The takeaway

Pam Bondi's refusal to comply with a Congressional subpoena related to the Epstein scandal raises serious concerns about a potential coverup and the continued influence of Trump's allies within the Justice Department. This case highlights the need for greater accountability and transparency in government, particularly when it comes to high-profile cases involving powerful individuals.