- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Alaska LNG Developer Sets Rapid Construction Timeline, Lawmakers Skeptical
Glenfarne plans to start initial construction in April, but Alaska lawmakers question the company's ability to meet its ambitious goals.
Published on Feb. 12, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The developer of the Alaska LNG project, Glenfarne, has told federal regulators that it expects to begin initial construction in April, including building construction camps, access roads, and nearly 100 bridge crossings to support pipeline construction. The company aims to start laying the 800-mile gas pipeline by the end of this year. However, some Alaska lawmakers are skeptical that Glenfarne can meet this rapid timeline, citing the need for the company to still take important steps like seeking state support and obtaining regulatory approvals.
Why it matters
The Alaska LNG project has been in development for decades, and its success is seen as crucial for supporting Alaska's economy and providing a new source of natural gas for both in-state and export markets. The project's ambitious timeline and need for state support have raised concerns among lawmakers about whether it can be realistically achieved.
The details
Glenfarne has not yet announced a final investment decision for the $44 billion Alaska LNG project, though it has signed preliminary deals with gas producers and pipeline builders. The company says it is pursuing 'property tax reforms' with state and local leaders, and the governor plans to introduce a bill to reduce the state's oil and gas property taxes by 90% to assist the project. However, lawmakers say Glenfarne has not sought any formal support from the legislature, and they are skeptical the company can meet its timeline, citing the need for regulatory approvals and binding contracts with gas buyers and suppliers.
- Initial construction for developments such as man camps, access roads and bridge crossings is expected to begin on April 15, 2026.
- Glenfarne aims to start laying the 800-mile gas pipeline by the end of 2026.
The players
Glenfarne
The developer of the Alaska LNG project, a New York-based company.
Mike Dunleavy
The Governor of Alaska, a supporter of the Alaska LNG project.
Cathy Giessel
The Republican Senate Majority Leader in Alaska, who is skeptical of Glenfarne's timeline.
Elvi Gray-Jackson
A Democratic senator and chair of the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee in Alaska, who is cautiously optimistic about the project but doubts Glenfarne can meet its rapid timeline.
Chuck Kopp
The Republican House Majority Leader in Alaska, who is optimistic the Alaska LNG project will be built and is discussing the possibility of the state investing in the project.
What they’re saying
“Glenfarne has told us, 'Don't worry, this is a private-sector project. We will bear all of the cost. We will get investors. We will take all of the overruns and delays. We'll take all that responsibility.'”
— Cathy Giessel, Republican Senate Majority Leader (adn.com)
“Pending FERC authorization, we are moving forward with Early Works on a pace that will enable Alaska LNG to rapidly deliver reliable, affordable energy to Alaskans.”
— Tim Fitzpatrick, Spokesperson for Glenfarne (adn.com)
What’s next
The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.
The takeaway
This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.
