- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Certificate Lifecycle Management Fails Without Automation as Risks Increase
Info-Tech Research Group publishes blueprint to help enterprises adopt Certificate Lifecycle Management
Apr. 14, 2026 at 6:22pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
As certificate management becomes increasingly complex, enterprises must adopt automation-driven strategies to maintain digital trust and prepare for the post-quantum future.Arlington TodayAccording to a new resource from Info-Tech Research Group, certificate management has become nearly unmanageable due to shrinking certificate lifespans and the proliferation of both human and non-human identities. Traditional PKI cryptography is no longer sufficient to meet these challenges, and organizations that fail to automate certificate management are exposing themselves to higher risk of outages, breaches, financial losses, and reputational damage. Info-Tech's newly published blueprint, Master Certificate Lifecycle Management, provides a four-phase roadmap for automating certificate management to achieve true crypto-agility and safeguard digital trust.
Why it matters
As AI agents, IoT devices, and post-quantum cryptography redefine enterprise security, organizations must adopt certificate lifecycle management (CLM) to ensure continuity, compliance, and resilience. With certificate lifespans set to shrink to just 47 days by 2029, crypto-agility is no longer a luxury but the backbone of digital trust. IT and security leaders must evolve their PKI strategies now to prepare for shorter certificate cycles and the post-quantum future.
The details
Info-Tech's four-phase CLM framework includes: 1) Observe - Discover, monitor, and maintain a centralized inventory of all certificates to ensure visibility and identify risks; 2) Standardize - Define cryptographic standards, architectures, and policies to ensure consistency and alignment with organizational requirements; 3) Automate - Implement automation across certificate lifecycle processes to reduce manual effort, eliminate human error, and enable scalable management; and 4) Measure - Track performance metrics and program effectiveness to drive continuous improvement and ensure resilience.
- By 2029, certificate lifespans are expected to shrink to just 47 days.
The players
Info-Tech Research Group
A leading global research and advisory firm that serves over 30,000 IT, HR, and marketing professionals worldwide.
Jon Nelson
A principal advisory director in the security and privacy practice at Info-Tech Research Group.
What they’re saying
“Organizations that fail to automate certificate management are exposing themselves to higher risk of outages, breaches, financial losses, and reputational damage.”
— Jon Nelson, Principal Advisory Director, Security and Privacy Practice
“Crypto-agility allows organizations to seamlessly adapt their cryptographic methods to meet changing security demands. By adopting an automation-driven CLM strategy today, leaders can stay ahead of rapidly shrinking certificate lifespans and build a resilient security posture that will stand up to quantum threats tomorrow.”
— Jon Nelson, Principal Advisory Director, Security and Privacy Practice
What’s next
The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.
The takeaway
This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.

