Texas Republicans Aim to Overturn Landmark Plyler v. Doe Ruling

Efforts to reverse 1982 Supreme Court decision that allows undocumented children to attend public schools raise concerns over education access and state budget impacts.

Apr. 15, 2026 at 7:29pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A serene, nostalgic painting of an empty school classroom or hallway, with warm sunlight streaming through the windows and creating deep shadows across the floors and walls, capturing the quiet tension and uncertainty surrounding the future of educational access for undocumented children.The landmark Plyler v. Doe ruling has allowed millions of undocumented children to access public education, but efforts to overturn the decision could deprive them of that opportunity.Tyler Today

More than four decades after the landmark Supreme Court case Plyler v. Doe established that undocumented children could attend American public schools, many Texas Republicans are now working to reverse that ruling. Recent hearings, legislation, and closed-door meetings with White House officials show a concerted effort to restrict education access for undocumented students, despite warnings about the severe consequences for public education and state budgets.

Why it matters

The Plyler v. Doe decision has allowed an estimated 1.8 million undocumented children to attend public schools across the U.S. Overturning this ruling could deprive these students of an education, create a 'subclass of illiterates,' and have far-reaching impacts on unemployment, welfare, and crime rates, according to the original Supreme Court ruling. It would also significantly impact state and local tax revenues that fund public schools.

The details

In 1975, the Texas Legislature passed a law restricting free public education to children of citizens and legally admitted foreigners. This led to a lawsuit filed by MALDEF on behalf of four families in Tyler, Texas in 1977. A federal judge ruled against the policy, finding it did not deter undocumented immigration and that any savings would be minimal. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled 5-4 in 1982 that the Fourteenth Amendment protects 'persons,' not just citizens, and that children cannot be punished for their parents' immigration status. Now, Texas Republicans are renewing efforts to overturn this landmark decision, with a recent House Judiciary subcommittee hearing and closed-door meetings with White House officials.

  • In 1975, the Texas Legislature passed HB 1126 restricting free public education to children of citizens and legally admitted foreigners.
  • On July 21, 1977, the Tyler Independent School District board adopted a policy charging undocumented children $1,000 per year.
  • On June 15, 1982, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Plyler v. Doe that the Fourteenth Amendment protects 'persons,' not only citizens.
  • In February 2025, state Senator Bob Hall filed SB 1205 to require districts to document student immigration status and charge tuition to undocumented children.
  • On June 4, 2025, the DOJ sued Texas over the Texas Dream Act, which allowed undocumented students to receive in-state college tuition.

The players

Plyler v. Doe

A landmark 1982 Supreme Court case that established that undocumented children could attend American public schools.

Chip Roy

Chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government, who called the Plyler v. Doe ruling 'constitutionally indefensible'.

Stephen Miller

White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Advisor, who met with Texas Republican legislators to discuss restricting public school funding for undocumented children.

Tom Oliverson

Chair of the Texas House Republican Caucus, who described the reaction to Miller's question about a 'RINO problem in Texas' as 'uncomfortable silence'.

MALDEF

The Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which represented the families who sued the Tyler Independent School District in the original Plyler v. Doe case.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“All students deserve access to a quality education that unlocks a better future for them and their families.”

— Zeph Capo, President, Texas AFT

“First, the decision is incorporated (since 1996) in federal statute, so it is now a part of federal legislated policy, not just a part of Supreme Court precedent. Second, no laws directly violating Plyler are under serious consideration in the states because careful review of such legislation reveals the likely severe consequences not just for the students who would be excluded, but for all of public education.”

— Thomas Saenz, President and General Counsel, MALDEF

What’s next

The judge in the Texas Dream Act case will decide whether to block the law, which could impact thousands of undocumented students enrolled in Texas colleges and universities.

The takeaway

The efforts to overturn the landmark Plyler v. Doe decision highlight the ongoing political battles over immigration and education access in Texas. While the ruling appears secure for now, the potential consequences of reversing it - including lost tax revenue, increased social costs, and the creation of a 'subclass of illiterates' - underscore the high stakes involved.