- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Malvern Today
By the People, for the People
Deadline Approaching for NuScale Power Investors to Join Securities Fraud Class Action
Berger Montague law firm advises NuScale investors to inquire about lawsuit by April 20, 2026
Apr. 14, 2026 at 4:37pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
A minimalist sculpture representing the technical and financial complexities of small modular nuclear reactors.Malvern TodayNational plaintiffs' law firm Berger Montague PC has filed a class action lawsuit against NuScale Power Corporation (NYSE: SMR) on behalf of investors who purchased NuScale securities during the period from May 13, 2025 through November 6, 2025. The lawsuit alleges that NuScale misled investors about its commercialization and deployment strategy for its NuScale Power Module (NPM) technology, including touting ENTRA1 Energy LLC as an exclusive commercialization partner despite ENTRA1's lack of experience in nuclear power projects.
Why it matters
The lawsuit alleges that NuScale's misleading statements about its commercialization strategy and partnership with ENTRA1 Energy led to a significant drop in the company's stock price when the truth emerged. This case highlights the importance of transparency and accurate disclosures for publicly traded companies, especially those in the emerging nuclear energy technology sector.
The details
According to the lawsuit, NuScale revealed on November 6, 2025 that its third-quarter general and administrative expenses had surged to $519 million, largely due to a $495 million milestone payment to ENTRA1. The company also reported net losses of $532 million. During a conference call, CEO John L. Hopkins confirmed that milestone payments under an agreement with the Tennessee Valley Authority could potentially exceed $3 billion. Following these disclosures, NuScale's Class A shares dropped more than 12% over two trading sessions.
- The class period is from May 13, 2025 through November 6, 2025.
- The investor deadline to seek lead plaintiff status is April 20, 2026.
The players
Berger Montague PC
A national plaintiffs' law firm that has filed the class action lawsuit against NuScale Power Corporation.
NuScale Power Corporation
A company headquartered in Corvallis, Oregon that designs and deploys small modular nuclear reactors, providing innovative nuclear energy solutions globally.
ENTRA1 Energy LLC
An entity that NuScale allegedly touted as an exclusive commercialization partner for its NuScale Power Module (NPM) technology, despite ENTRA1's lack of experience in owning, financing, or operating nuclear power projects.
John L. Hopkins
The CEO of NuScale Power Corporation.
What they’re saying
“Investors who purchased NuScale securities during the Class Period may, no later than April 20, 2026, seek to be appointed as a lead plaintiff representative of the class.”
— Berger Montague PC
What’s next
The judge in the case will decide on April 20, 2026 whether to allow investors to join the class action lawsuit against NuScale Power Corporation.
The takeaway
This case highlights the importance of transparency and accurate disclosures for publicly traded companies, especially those in the emerging nuclear energy technology sector. Investors should be vigilant in scrutinizing a company's claims about its commercialization strategies and partnerships to ensure they are making informed investment decisions.

