- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Franklin Today
By the People, for the People
Supreme Court Rejects Ohio Congressional Candidate's Bid to Run as Republican
Samuel Ronan, a former Democratic candidate, was disqualified from the GOP primary after alleged scheme to 'trick' voters exposed.
Apr. 10, 2026 at 9:22am
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The Supreme Court's decision to block a candidate's attempt to infiltrate the Republican primary exposes the fragility of the democratic process and the need for vigilance against deception.Franklin TodayThe Supreme Court has rejected a former Democratic candidate's bid to run as a Republican in Ohio's 15th Congressional District, upholding a state decision to disqualify him for misrepresenting his party affiliation. Samuel Ronan was caught publicly admitting that his candidacy was part of a calculated strategy to run Democrats as Republicans in 'deep red districts' to 'get a foot in the door.'
Why it matters
This case highlights concerns about political candidates attempting to deceive voters by falsely claiming membership in a party they do not actually belong to. Ohio election officials argued Ronan's actions threatened the integrity of the electoral process, and the courts agreed that the First Amendment does not protect candidates who submit fraudulent declarations of candidacy.
The details
Ronan, a self-described 'progressive,' signed a declaration of candidacy swearing he was a Republican, but was later caught on record admitting his true intent was to run as a Democrat in a 'deep red' GOP district. A Republican voter filed a protest with the Franklin County Board of Elections, presenting social media posts and interviews as evidence of Ronan's alleged scheme. After the board deadlocked along party lines, Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose stepped in to remove Ronan from the ballot, citing the 'integrity of the electoral process.'
- Ronan filed a federal lawsuit in April 2026 claiming his First Amendment rights were violated.
- Chief US District Judge Sarah D. Morrison rejected Ronan's arguments in April 2026.
- Ronan asked the Supreme Court to intervene prior to early voting in April 2026.
- The Supreme Court denied Ronan's request without explanation in April 2026.
The players
Samuel Ronan
A former Democratic state and national candidate who attempted to run as a Republican in Ohio's 15th Congressional District against GOP incumbent Rep. Mike Carey.
Mark Schare
A Republican voter who filed a protest with the Franklin County Board of Elections, presenting evidence of Ronan's alleged scheme to 'trick' GOP voters.
Frank LaRose
Ohio Secretary of State who stepped in to remove Ronan from the ballot, citing the 'integrity of the electoral process.'
Sarah D. Morrison
Chief US District Judge who rejected Ronan's arguments, ruling the First Amendment does not protect a candidate who submits a fraudulent declaration of candidacy.
Brett Kavanaugh
Supreme Court Justice who referred Ronan's application to the full court, which denied his request without explanation.
What they’re saying
“It cannot be the case that a State must allow a candidate on a partisan ballot even if he lied about his party affiliation simply because the First Amendment is implicated.”
— Sarah D. Morrison, Chief US District Judge
“This case was a matter of the integrity of the electoral process.”
— Frank LaRose, Ohio Secretary of State
The takeaway
This case highlights the importance of maintaining the integrity of the electoral process and preventing candidates from deceiving voters about their true political affiliations. It serves as a warning that the courts will not tolerate such attempts to undermine the democratic process.

