- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Franklin Today
By the People, for the People
Ohio Supreme Court Blocks Candidate Over Alleged GOP Infiltration Scheme
Ruling upholds state's decision to disqualify progressive candidate from Republican primary ballot.
Apr. 10, 2026 at 3:51am
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The Supreme Court's decision to uphold Ohio's rejection of a candidate who misrepresented his party affiliation exposes the fragility of electoral integrity.Franklin TodayThe Ohio Supreme Court has rejected a self-described 'progressive' candidate's bid to enter the state's Republican primary, leaving in place a decision by election officials to disqualify him for misrepresenting his party affiliation. Samuel Ronan, a former Democratic state and national candidate, attempted to run as a Republican in Ohio's 15th Congressional District, but was caught publicly admitting his candidacy was part of a strategy to 'trick' GOP voters by running Democrats as Republicans in 'deep red districts'.
Why it matters
The case highlights ongoing concerns about political candidates misrepresenting their party affiliations to gain access to primary ballots, which election officials argue undermines the integrity of the electoral process. The Supreme Court's decision upholds Ohio's ability to enforce rules around candidate eligibility and party membership.
The details
Ronan signed a declaration of candidacy swearing he was a Republican, but court documents show he was caught publicly admitting his candidacy was part of a plan to run Democrats as Republicans in conservative districts. A Republican voter filed a protest presenting social media posts and interviews as evidence of Ronan's alleged scheme. Ohio's Secretary of State then stepped in to remove Ronan from the ballot, citing the 'integrity of the electoral process'.
- On April 10, 2026, the Supreme Court rejected Ronan's bid to enter the Republican primary.
- In the lead-up to the primary, Ronan was disqualified by Ohio election officials in March 2026.
The players
Samuel Ronan
A former Democratic state and national candidate who attempted to run as a Republican in Ohio's 15th Congressional District, but was disqualified for misrepresenting his party affiliation.
Mike Carey
The Republican incumbent in Ohio's 15th Congressional District.
Mark Schare
A Republican voter who filed a protest with the Franklin County Board of Elections, presenting evidence of Ronan's alleged scheme to 'trick' GOP voters.
Frank LaRose
Ohio's Secretary of State who stepped in to remove Ronan from the Republican primary ballot, citing concerns over the 'integrity of the electoral process'.
Sarah D. Morrison
The Chief U.S. District Judge who rejected Ronan's federal lawsuit claiming his First Amendment rights were violated.
What they’re saying
“It cannot be the case that a State must allow a candidate on a partisan ballot even if he lied about his party affiliation simply because the First Amendment is implicated.”
— Sarah D. Morrison, Chief U.S. District Judge
“The case was a matter of 'the integrity of the electoral process,' slamming Ronan's alleged mission to infiltrate the party.”
— Frank LaRose, Ohio Secretary of State
What’s next
The judge's ruling upholding Ronan's disqualification from the Republican primary ballot has been finalized, and early voting is set to begin in the coming weeks.
The takeaway
This case highlights ongoing concerns about political candidates misrepresenting their party affiliations to gain access to primary ballots, which election officials argue undermines the integrity of the electoral process. The Supreme Court's decision upholds Ohio's ability to enforce rules around candidate eligibility and party membership.

