New York City Proposes $500M Surcharge on Luxury Second Homes

The measure aims to discourage speculative investment and generate revenue for affordable housing.

Apr. 19, 2026 at 1:29am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A serene, photorealistic painting of a tall, sleek luxury apartment building in a major city, with the building's facade bathed in warm, golden sunlight and deep shadows, conveying a sense of solitude and contemplation.The proposed luxury unit surcharge aims to discourage speculative investment in vacant high-end properties and generate revenue for affordable housing initiatives.NYC Today

New York City is advancing a proposal to impose a $500 million surcharge on second homes owned by non-residents, a measure city officials say targets luxury properties that remain vacant for much of the year. The proposed tax would apply to residential units valued at $5 million or more that are not the primary residence of the owner, with an estimated 10,000 such units potentially affected across Manhattan, Brooklyn, and other boroughs.

Why it matters

Supporters of the measure argue that the tax would discourage speculative investment in luxury real estate and help address the city's ongoing housing shortage, as many of these second homes sit empty for extended periods, contributing to underutilized housing stock while driving up prices in competitive markets. However, real estate industry groups have expressed concern that the surcharge could prompt wealthy owners to relocate their primary residences or shift ownership structures to avoid the tax.

The details

The proposed surcharge is expected to raise approximately $500 million annually, based on current assessments of high-value secondary properties. The city's Independent Budget Office is currently reviewing the fiscal impact of the proposal, including potential effects on property values, transaction volumes, and related industries such as construction, interior design, and property management. If adopted, the surcharge would take effect at the start of the next fiscal year, with payments due annually alongside existing property taxes.

  • The city's Independent Budget Office is expected to release a final report on the proposal within 60 days.
  • If adopted, the surcharge would take effect at the start of the next fiscal year.

The players

Lynn Schulman

Chair of the New York City Council's Committee on Housing and Buildings, a supporter of the measure.

James Whelan

President of the Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY), who has expressed concern about the potential impact of the surcharge on investment and development.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“This is about fairness and function. When luxury units are bought as investment vehicles and left vacant, they remove housing from the market without contributing to the city's tax base in proportion to their value. This surcharge ensures those properties pay their share.”

— Lynn Schulman, Chair, New York City Council Committee on Housing and Buildings

“We share the goal of increasing housing availability, but broad-based taxes on secondary properties may unintentionally discourage investment in new development and renovation. Any policy must balance revenue goals with the need to maintain a competitive environment for residential construction and property improvement.”

— James Whelan, President, Real Estate Board of New York

What’s next

The city's Independent Budget Office is expected to release a final report on the proposal within 60 days, which will inform any revisions before the measure proceeds to a full council vote.

The takeaway

This proposal highlights the ongoing tension between the need for affordable housing and the desire to maintain New York City's status as a global hub for investment and talent. The outcome of this measure could have significant implications for the city's real estate market and its ability to address its housing challenges.