AI Legal Advice Raises Concerns in Family Courts

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The growing use of generative artificial intelligence to provide free legal advice and document drafting for self-represented litigants in family court proceedings is raising significant concerns among judges and legal experts. While AI tools can help individuals navigate complex legal processes, courts have reported receiving filings containing fabricated case law, incorrect interpretations of legislation, and overly generic advice that fails to address the nuanced circumstances of individual cases. Legal experts caution that relying on AI carries specific risks, including the potential for hallucinated legal precedents, misapplication of jurisdictional laws, and the inadvertent waiver of rights due to poorly worded agreements.

Why it matters

The core issue lies in the current regulatory gap, as most jurisdictions do not explicitly prohibit the use of AI for self-help legal purposes, but neither do they endorse or regulate its use in formal court proceedings. Unlike licensed attorneys, AI tools are not bound by professional conduct rules, duty of confidentiality, or obligations to provide competent representation. This raises significant questions about access to justice, legal ethics, and the boundaries of self-representation.

The details

A growing number of people involved in family court cases—particularly those dealing with divorce, child custody, and asset division—are using AI-powered platforms to draft legal documents, understand court procedures, and generate arguments. These tools, often marketed as low-cost or free alternatives to lawyers, are being used to supplement or replace formal legal representation in jurisdictions where legal aid is limited or unaffordable. In New Zealand, the Family Court has seen an uptick in self-represented litigants relying on AI-generated content, prompting judicial concern over the accuracy and appropriateness of such material. Similar trends are emerging in the United States, where court administrators in New York and other jurisdictions have observed an increase in filings containing language indicative of AI generation.

• In April 2026, no jurisdiction has enacted binding rules prohibiting the use of AI in family court filings by self-represented litigants.

What’s next

Court technology committees in several U.S. States are exploring ways to detect AI-generated filings, not to ban them outright, but to flag them for judicial review. Some pilots are testing disclaimers that would require self-represented parties to attest whether AI was used in preparing documents, akin to existing requirements for interpreter use or third-party assistance.