Land Rover Owners Sue Over Premature Brake Wear

A lawsuit alleges Range Rover models have defective brakes, but the automaker claims customers must use arbitration.

Apr. 13, 2026 at 10:41pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

An abstract, blurred image of a Range Rover SUV in motion, with streaks of bright red, blue, and orange conveying a sense of speed and modern engineering.As the legal battle over allegedly defective Range Rover brakes escalates, the case could have major implications for how automakers use fine print to limit customer lawsuits.NYC Today

A lawsuit filed in federal court in New Jersey alleges that 2023 Land Rover Range Rover and Range Rover Sport models suffer from premature brake wear, requiring expensive repairs not covered under warranty. The automaker is arguing that the owners must go through binding arbitration rather than a lawsuit, based on language in the vehicle's warranty booklet. A judge has temporarily denied the automaker's motion to force arbitration, ruling there is not enough evidence the owners agreed to those terms.

Why it matters

This case could set an important precedent on whether automakers can use fine print in warranty booklets to force customers into arbitration rather than allowing them to sue over alleged defects. If the plaintiffs prevail, it could limit how companies can use arbitration clauses to shield themselves from lawsuits.

The details

The lawsuit alleges the Range Rover models have a braking system that generates excessive heat, causing the rear brake pads and rotors to wear out prematurely - in some cases requiring replacement in under 20,000 miles. The repair bills cited range from around $2,000 to over $2,500. The owners argue these repairs should have been covered under warranty, pointing to technical bulletins issued to dealers about the brake issues. However, Jaguar Land Rover is arguing the case should be forced into arbitration based on language in the vehicle's warranty booklet that the owners say they never saw or agreed to.

  • The lawsuit was filed in federal court in New Jersey in 2026.
  • The judge issued a ruling on the automaker's motion to force arbitration in April 2026.

The players

Boris Zats

A New York plaintiff who paid $2,476.77 plus tax to replace the brakes on his 2023 Range Rover SE after 14,825 miles.

Amir Gupta

A California plaintiff who alleges he spent $2,509.43 before tax to replace the brakes on his 2023 Range Rover Autobiography after 16,601 miles.

Frank Ruffolo

An Illinois plaintiff who says he paid nearly $2,000 to replace the brakes on one 2023 Range Rover at 11,938 miles, then another $2,107.46 on a second SUV at just 13,866 miles.

Jaguar Land Rover

The automaker that is arguing the case should be forced into arbitration based on language in the vehicle's warranty booklet.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The judge denied the automaker's motion to force arbitration without prejudice, meaning Jaguar Land Rover can try again after limited discovery to determine how the arbitration clause was delivered to customers.

The takeaway

This case highlights the growing use of arbitration clauses by companies to avoid lawsuits, and the legal battles over whether those clauses are truly binding if consumers were unaware of them. The outcome could set an important precedent on the limits of how automakers and other businesses can use fine print to shield themselves from litigation.