Apollo Global Management Faces Securities Class Action Over Epstein Ties

Lawsuit claims CEO Marc Rowan misled investors about firm's relationship with disgraced financier

Apr. 13, 2026 at 11:43pm

A high-end, photorealistic studio still-life photograph featuring a stack of financial documents, a pen, and a calculator arranged elegantly on a clean, monochromatic background, conceptually representing the complex corporate strategy and finance at the center of the Apollo Global Management lawsuit.A minimalist studio still life captures the abstract financial entanglement at the heart of the Apollo Global Management lawsuit.NYC Today

A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Apollo Global Management (APO) alleging the firm and its top executives made false statements about the company's ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit claims Apollo CEO Marc Rowan and other leaders misled investors by claiming the firm "never did any business" with Epstein, when in fact they had wide-ranging discussions with him regarding tax arrangements and potential deals throughout the 2010s. The revelations have led to a $12 billion drop in Apollo's market capitalization.

Why it matters

The lawsuit highlights growing scrutiny over Apollo's relationship with Epstein and the firm's transparency with investors. It comes amid increased pressure on financial institutions to be upfront about any connections to the disgraced financier, whose dealings have cast a long shadow over the industry. The case also underscores the potential legal and reputational risks for public companies that are accused of misleading shareholders.

The details

The lawsuit, filed by law firm Hagens Berman, alleges that Apollo and its leadership made false statements about the firm's ties to Epstein. It claims that despite Apollo's public assurances that its relationship with Epstein "began and ended" with former CEO Leon Black, recent reports indicate current CEO Marc Rowan and other top executives held extensive discussions with Epstein on tax matters and potential deals. The complaint cites a series of investigative reports, including a Financial Times article and a CNN investigation, that have revealed new details about Apollo's entanglement with Epstein.

  • On Feb. 1, 2026, the Financial Times reported that Rowan and other Apollo executives held wide-ranging discussions with Epstein regarding the firm's tax arrangements and potential "inversion" deals.
  • On Feb. 17, 2026, two major teachers' unions with over $27.5 billion in Apollo commitments urged the SEC to investigate the firm's "lack of candor" over its ties to Epstein.
  • On Feb. 21, 2026, CNN published new details alleging Epstein received internal Apollo financial documents and hosted meetings between the firm's executives and international private banks.

The players

Apollo Global Management, Inc.

A publicly traded alternative investment management firm based in New York.

Marc Rowan

The current CEO of Apollo Global Management.

Jeffrey Epstein

A convicted sex offender and disgraced financier who had ties to various high-profile individuals and institutions.

Hagens Berman

A national shareholder rights law firm that filed the securities class action lawsuit against Apollo.

Reed Kathrein

The Hagens Berman partner leading the investigation into the pending claims against Apollo.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“For years, Apollo assured the market that its ties to Jeffrey Epstein began and ended with Leon Black. The recent reports and the complaint suggest a deeper level of professional entanglement involving current CEO Marc Rowan.”

— Reed Kathrein, Hagens Berman partner

What’s next

The critical deadline for Apollo investors to join the class action lawsuit is May 1, 2026. The lawsuit seeks to represent investors who purchased or acquired Apollo securities between May 10, 2021, and February 21, 2026.

The takeaway

This case highlights the growing scrutiny over financial firms' connections to Jeffrey Epstein and the potential legal and reputational risks they face if they are accused of misleading investors about such relationships. It underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in the alternative investment industry.