Iraq War Vet Dems Slam 'Chicken Hawks' Over Iran Strikes

Lawmakers with combat experience criticize Trump administration's rhetoric and decision-making process.

Published on Mar. 5, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Democratic representatives who served in the Iraq war, including Rep. Pat Ryan and Rep. Eugene Vindman, have issued statements denouncing the rhetoric and decision-making around the ongoing U.S. strikes on Iran. They criticized 'chicken hawks' in the Trump administration who have never served in the military for talking tough about the conflict.

Why it matters

The criticism from veteran Democratic lawmakers highlights the growing partisan divide over the Iran strikes and the use of military force, with those who have firsthand combat experience voicing concerns about the administration's approach.

The details

Rep. Pat Ryan, a New York Democrat who served twice in Iraq, said he would 'lose my mind' if he heard 'one more chicken hawk who's never served a single day in uniform' try to talk tough about the Iran situation. Rep. Eugene Vindman called the conflict an 'unnecessary use of US resources' and said 'wars are easy to start and hard to finish.' Former Trump national security advisor John Bolton also expressed concerns that the president hasn't thought through the implications of the strikes.

  • The U.S. launched bombing strikes against Iran earlier this week.

The players

Rep. Pat Ryan

A Democratic representative from New York who served twice in the Iraq war.

Rep. Eugene Vindman

A Democratic representative who has criticized the administration's approach to the Iran conflict.

John Bolton

Former national security advisor to President Trump who has expressed concerns about the president's decision-making process on Iran.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“If I hear one more chicken hawk who's never served a single day in uniform sitting in a gold-plated office in DC or Mar-a-Lago or anywhere else, try to talk tough having never seen what war is about, I'm going to lose my mind.”

— Rep. Pat Ryan, Democratic Representative from New York (CNN)

“I will not be shedding a tear for the Iranian regime and the Ayatollah. I understand the threat but I also understand that wars are easy to start and hard to finish.”

— Rep. Eugene Vindman, Democratic Representative (CNN)

“As long as things are going successfully, he'll stick with it. If we run into real difficulty, and I hope we don't, and we shouldn't at this point, but if we do, because anything is possible, that would be the testing time to see whether he was able to stick it out.”

— John Bolton, Former National Security Advisor to President Trump (The Daily Beast Podcast)

What’s next

The administration has not yet laid out a clear strategy or objectives for the ongoing strikes on Iran, raising concerns among lawmakers about the long-term implications.

The takeaway

The criticism from veteran Democratic lawmakers highlights the partisan divide over the use of military force, with those who have combat experience voicing concerns about the administration's approach and rhetoric around the Iran conflict.