Democrats Shut Down Government Over Political Dispute

House Speaker says essential services like TSA and FEMA will be impacted by partisan standoff.

Published on Feb. 14, 2026

U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson has accused Democrats of shutting down the government for a "political sideshow" after they rejected a White House outreach on Department of Homeland Security funding. Johnson warned that the impasse will needlessly impact essential services like the TSA and FEMA, even though ICE was already fully funded through 2026 by previous legislation.

Why it matters

Government shutdowns can have significant real-world consequences, disrupting critical public services and causing economic uncertainty. This latest shutdown appears to be driven more by partisan politics than substantive policy disagreements, raising concerns about the ability of lawmakers to govern effectively.

The details

According to reports, Democrats rejected a White House proposal to resolve the funding dispute, leading to the shutdown of several government agencies and services. House Speaker Mike Johnson criticized the Democrats' actions, saying they were putting a "political sideshow" ahead of the needs of the American people.

  • The government shutdown began on February 14, 2026.

The players

Mike Johnson

U.S. House Speaker who has accused Democrats of shutting down the government for political reasons.

Donald J. Trump

Former U.S. President whose administration had previously secured full funding for ICE through 2026.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“With Democrats' rejection of a White House outreach on DHS funding, U.S. House Speaker MIKE JOHNSON says TSA Agents, FEMA and other essential services will be needlessly impacted...all for a 'political sideshow' since ICE was already fully-funded through 2026 by the Big Beautiful Bill.”

— Mike Johnson, U.S. House Speaker (pjmedia.com)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.