Epstein Island Acid Purchase Raises Eyebrows Amid Abuse Probe

Sulfuric acid order in 2018 coincides with renewed federal investigation into Epstein's sex trafficking activities.

Published on Feb. 12, 2026

Recent disclosures from the Jeffrey Epstein case continue to generate headlines, with a 2018 purchase of 330 gallons of sulfuric acid resurfacing as a focal point of online speculation. While authorities maintain the acid was intended for routine water treatment on Epstein's private island, the timing - coinciding with a renewed federal investigation into his sex trafficking activities - has fueled persistent theories about its potential misuse.

Why it matters

The Epstein case exemplifies a growing trend in investigations: the meticulous examination of financial transactions, even those that appear routine. Law enforcement agencies are increasingly leveraging data analytics and forensic accounting to uncover hidden connections and potential criminal activity, extending beyond high-profile individuals to corporations and organizations facing scrutiny.

The details

Documents reveal that LSJE LLC, an entity associated with Epstein, ordered six 55-gallon drums of sulfuric acid in December 2018. The $4,373.17 transaction was made to Gemini Seawater Systems, LLC, and included freight, fuel, and insurance. The paperwork explicitly links the purchase to a reverse osmosis (RO) plant, suggesting a legitimate need for water treatment. Epstein's island, like many isolated properties, relies on systems like RO for desalination and maintaining water quality.

  • The order was placed on December 6, 2018, the same day the Southern District of New York reopened or initiated a renewed federal investigation into Epstein's sex trafficking activities.

The players

LSJE LLC

An entity associated with Jeffrey Epstein that ordered the sulfuric acid.

Gemini Seawater Systems, LLC

The company that sold the 330 gallons of sulfuric acid to LSJE LLC.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.