Supreme Court Upholds Right to Resell Imported Goods

Ruling protects consumers from copyright claims on reselling foreign-made products

Apr. 20, 2026 at 9:11am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A close-up view of a used textbook sitting on a wooden desk, the pages and cover illuminated by warm, directional sunlight casting deep shadows, conveying a sense of nostalgia and the personal value of resold goods.The Supreme Court's ruling protects the right of consumers to resell their legally purchased goods, even if those products were manufactured overseas.Ithaca Today

In a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the right of consumers to resell products they have legally purchased, even if those products were made abroad and imported into the United States. The case, Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, centered on a Cornell University student who bought textbooks in Thailand and resold them in the U.S., which the publisher claimed was copyright infringement. The Court rejected the publisher's argument that the 'first-sale doctrine' only applies to products made in the U.S., ruling that this would have far-reaching implications for the legality of reselling a wide range of imported goods.

Why it matters

The Supreme Court's decision has significant implications for consumer rights and the resale market. If the Court had sided with the publisher, it could have made it illegal to resell a wide variety of imported products, from cars to electronics, without permission from the copyright holders of the embedded software. This ruling preserves the ability of consumers to freely resell their legally purchased goods.

The details

The case centered on Supap Kirtsaeng, a Cornell University student who purchased textbooks in Thailand at lower prices and resold them in the U.S. through eBay. Publisher John Wiley & Sons sued Kirtsaeng for copyright infringement, arguing that the 'first-sale doctrine' only applies to products made in the U.S., not imported goods. However, the Supreme Court rejected this interpretation, noting that it would have far-reaching implications that could make it illegal to resell a wide range of imported products, from cars to smartphones.

  • The Supreme Court issued its 6-3 ruling on April 19, 2026.

The players

Supap Kirtsaeng

A Cornell University student who purchased textbooks in Thailand and resold them in the U.S. through eBay.

John Wiley & Sons

A publishing company that sued Kirtsaeng for copyright infringement, arguing that the 'first-sale doctrine' only applies to products made in the U.S.

U.S. Supreme Court

The highest court in the United States, which ruled 6-3 in favor of Kirtsaeng, upholding the right of consumers to resell imported goods.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“'A geographical interpretation would prevent the resale of, say, a car, without the permission of the holder of each copyright on each piece of copyrighted automobile software. [. . .] Without that permission a foreign car owner could not sell his or her used car.'”

— Justice Stephen Breyer, Supreme Court Justice

What’s next

The Supreme Court's ruling is expected to have a significant impact on the ongoing debate over intellectual property rights and consumer protections, potentially leading to further copyright reform efforts in Congress.

The takeaway

This Supreme Court decision is a major victory for consumer rights, preserving the ability of people to freely resell their legally purchased goods without fear of copyright infringement claims, even if those products were manufactured abroad. It prevents copyright holders from unduly restricting the resale market and ensures consumers maintain control over their own property.