Sex Charges Dropped Against Former North Dakota Game Director

Prosecutors may still decide to retry the case against Terry Steinwand.

Apr. 14, 2026 at 4:55pm

An extreme close-up of a pair of handcuffs reflecting a bright flash of light, conceptually representing the complexities of a dismissed sex crime case.The dismissal of sex crime charges against a former state official exposes the challenges of prosecuting high-profile cases.Mandan Today

Former North Dakota Game and Fish Director Terry Steinwand will no longer face gross sexual imposition charges after the court dismissed the case last week. Steinwand had been arrested for allegedly touching a child inappropriately, which could have resulted in a life sentence if convicted. Two previous plea deal attempts were rejected by a judge, and prosecutors say they are still determining if the case will be tried again.

Why it matters

This case highlights the complexities of prosecuting high-profile sex crime allegations, especially when plea deals are rejected by the court. The dismissal raises questions about the strength of the evidence and the potential challenges the state faced in securing a conviction.

The details

Terry Steinwand, the former director of the North Dakota Game and Fish Department, was arrested and charged with gross sexual imposition for allegedly touching a child inappropriately. If convicted, he could have faced life in prison. However, the court has now dismissed the charges against Steinwand. Prosecutors say they are still determining whether to try the case again.

  • The charges against Steinwand were dismissed last week.
  • Two previous attempts to settle the case with a plea agreement were rejected by a Morton County judge last month.

The players

Terry Steinwand

The former director of the North Dakota Game and Fish Department who was facing gross sexual imposition charges that have now been dismissed.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

Prosecutors will decide whether to retry the case against Steinwand.

The takeaway

This case highlights the complexities of prosecuting high-profile sex crime allegations, especially when plea deals are rejected by the court. The dismissal raises questions about the strength of the evidence and the potential challenges the state faced in securing a conviction.