Minnesota bill to ban local officials' NDAs faces narrow path forward

Bipartisan legislation aims to increase transparency, but hit a setback in the House

Apr. 17, 2026 at 12:06pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A dimly lit, cinematic government office space with a lone desk and chair, the scene bathed in warm, diagonal sunlight and deep shadows, conceptually representing the quiet contemplation around the role of transparency in local politics.The debate over banning nondisclosure agreements for local officials in Minnesota reflects broader tensions around government transparency and accountability.Minneapolis Today

A bill to prohibit local officials in Minnesota from signing nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) has bipartisan support, but faces a narrow path forward after a setback in the state House. The legislation, co-authored by Rep. Emma Greenman (DFL-Minneapolis) and Rep. Drew Roach (R-Farmington), is described as a simple and much-needed measure to increase transparency in government.

Why it matters

The use of NDAs by local officials has been a growing concern, with critics arguing they can be used to conceal misconduct or limit public access to information. This bipartisan effort aims to address those transparency issues, though the bill's future remains uncertain after encountering resistance in the state legislature.

The details

The bill, HF 4077, would ban local officials from signing NDAs that prevent them from discussing government business. Supporters say the legislation is a straightforward way to promote open government, while opponents have raised concerns about potential unintended consequences.

  • The bill was introduced in the Minnesota Legislature in early 2026.

The players

Rep. Emma Greenman

A DFL (Democratic-Farmer-Labor) representative from Minneapolis who is a co-author of the bill to ban local officials' use of NDAs.

Rep. Drew Roach

A Republican representative from Farmington who is a co-author of the bill to ban local officials' use of NDAs.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Unfortunately, when some members come to the Capitol I think they forget who they represent.”

— Rep. Emma Greenman, DFL Representative, Minneapolis

What’s next

The bill will now move to the state Senate, where its supporters hope to gain more traction. However, the legislation faces an uphill battle after the setback in the House.

The takeaway

This bipartisan effort to ban the use of NDAs by local officials in Minnesota highlights the ongoing tension between government transparency and concerns about potential unintended consequences. The bill's narrow path forward underscores the challenges of enacting reforms that aim to increase public access to information about government activities.