Republicans Pursue Partisan Path to Fund Homeland Security After Talks Collapse

GOP leaders aim to bypass Democrats and fully fund ICE and Border Patrol through budget reconciliation process

Apr. 14, 2026 at 10:11pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A dimly lit, cinematic painting of an empty government office or hallway, with warm sunlight streaming in through windows and casting deep shadows, conveying a sense of political tension and uncertainty.The prolonged shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security has left key agencies without full funding, exposing partisan divides over immigration policy.Minneapolis Today

After bipartisan negotiations over funding the Department of Homeland Security broke down, Republican leaders in Congress are forging ahead with a risky partisan strategy to fully fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) through a budget reconciliation bill. This would allow them to bypass Democrats, who are demanding reforms to federal immigration enforcement tactics as a condition of approving the funding.

Why it matters

The prolonged shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security has left key agencies like TSA and FEMA without full funding, raising concerns about national security and disaster response capabilities. Republicans' decision to pursue a partisan path forward risks further inflaming partisan tensions over immigration policy and could lead to a messy legislative process with attempts to add unrelated priorities.

The details

Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Republicans will try to pass a narrow bill that only includes money for ICE and CBP, using the complicated budget reconciliation process that only requires a simple majority vote. This would deny Democrats the ability to demand reforms to federal immigration enforcement as part of the funding package. However, some Republican senators may push to add other unrelated priorities to the bill, complicating the process. Democrats have vowed to continue insisting on reforms to the agencies as a condition of approving the funding.

  • The Department of Homeland Security has been shut down since mid-February.
  • In March, the Senate passed legislation to fund most of the department, but it was blocked in the House.
  • After returning from recess this week, Republican leaders announced plans to pursue the partisan reconciliation strategy.
  • President Trump has set a deadline of June 1 for Congress to send him a focused reconciliation bill funding ICE and Border Patrol.

The players

John Thune

Senate Majority Leader, a Republican from South Dakota who is pushing for a narrow bill to quickly reopen the Department of Homeland Security.

Chuck Schumer

Senate Democratic Leader from New York, who says Democrats will continue to insist on reforms to federal immigration enforcement agencies.

Donald Trump

The President, who has set a June 1 deadline for Congress to send him a reconciliation bill funding ICE and Border Patrol.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Americans want ICE and Border Patrol reined in.”

— Chuck Schumer, Senate Democratic Leader

“President Trump set a deadline of June 1 to get to his desk a focused reconciliation bill that funds ICE and Border Patrol.”

— John Barrasso, Senate Republican Whip

“We are moving FAST and FOCUSED in keeping our Border SECURE!”

— Donald Trump

What’s next

The Republican-controlled Senate and House will now work to pass a reconciliation bill funding ICE and CBP, which could face challenges from members seeking to add unrelated priorities. Democrats have vowed to continue pushing for reforms to federal immigration enforcement as part of any funding package.

The takeaway

The breakdown of bipartisan negotiations over Homeland Security funding has led to a high-stakes partisan showdown, with Republicans pursuing a risky strategy to bypass Democrats and fully fund immigration enforcement agencies. This move risks further inflaming the bitter divide over immigration policy in Congress and could produce a messy legislative process.