Letter Calls for Nationalizing Energy, Not Elections

Author argues priorities are backwards on what should be nationalized in America

Published on Feb. 10, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

In a letter to the editor, the author argues that the current political climate has the priorities for nationalization backwards. They believe elections should remain decentralized and run by local officials, while the oil and gas industry should be nationalized to stabilize prices, address environmental damage, and fund the renewable energy transition.

Why it matters

This letter touches on the ongoing debate around the role of the federal government versus state/local control, particularly when it comes to elections and energy policy. The author's perspective challenges the common narrative that nationalization is an all-or-nothing proposition, and suggests a more nuanced approach.

The details

The author argues that the push to nationalize election oversight is misguided, as the current decentralized system run by local officials is a safeguard against mass hacking or fraud. They believe local control ensures voting reflects community needs, not federal dictates. In contrast, the author says the case for nationalizing oil and gas is growing, as these companies reap record profits while socializing environmental costs. By bringing these resources under public control, the author says prices could be stabilized for families and revenues directed toward renewable energy.

  • The letter was published on February 10, 2026.

The players

Austin

The author of the letter to the editor.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“In the current political climate, "nationalization" is often treated as an all-or-nothing proposition, but we are applying it to the wrong sectors of American life. We have our priorities backward: we should be keeping our elections local and our energy profits public.”

— Austin, Letter to the Editor Author (austindailyherald.com)

The takeaway

This letter challenges the common narrative around nationalization, arguing that the priorities should be reversed - keeping elections decentralized while nationalizing the oil and gas industry to address economic and environmental concerns.