Michigan AG Denies DOJ Request for 2024 Wayne County Ballots

State attorney general says federal election laws were not violated in the 2024 vote.

Apr. 20, 2026 at 5:16am

A highly abstract, fragmented painting featuring a central ballot box shape in shades of blue, red, and yellow, conveying the turbulent and contested nature of the 2024 election.Michigan's refusal to hand over 2024 election materials to federal investigators underscores the ongoing battle over voting rights and election integrity.Wayne Today

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has rejected a request from the U.S. Department of Justice to turn over 2024 election ballots and other voting materials from Wayne County. Nessel stated that there was no evidence of federal election law violations in the November 2024 election.

Why it matters

This decision by the Michigan AG highlights the ongoing tensions between state and federal authorities over election oversight and access to voting records. It comes amid broader concerns about the integrity of elections and the potential for partisan interference.

The details

The DOJ had requested the materials as part of a federal investigation into the 2024 election. However, Nessel asserted that there was no evidence of any wrongdoing and that the state would not be providing the requested documents.

  • On April 14, the DOJ sent a letter requesting the 2024 voting materials from Wayne County.
  • On April 19, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel rejected the DOJ's request.

The players

Dana Nessel

The Attorney General of the state of Michigan.

U.S. Department of Justice

The federal law enforcement agency that had requested access to the 2024 election materials from Wayne County, Michigan.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Federal election laws were not violated in the November 2024 election.”

— Dana Nessel, Michigan Attorney General

What’s next

It is unclear if the DOJ will pursue further legal action to gain access to the Wayne County voting materials.

The takeaway

This decision highlights the ongoing tensions between state and federal authorities over election oversight and the potential for partisan interference in the electoral process.