- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Judge Denies Former Kentucky Governor's Recusal Request in Child Support Case
Matt Bevin's motion to have the judge removed from the case was rejected, as the court says it has a duty to hear both sides.
Apr. 17, 2026 at 2:37pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The Bevin family's ongoing legal dispute over child support and custody issues has drawn intense media scrutiny, exposing the complexities of high-profile family law cases.Louisville TodayThe judge overseeing former Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin's child support and custody case with his son has denied Bevin's request for her to recuse herself. Bevin had argued the court 'has pre-judged issues before it,' and that the judge has been motivated by media attention when ruling in the case. However, the judge disagreed, saying the matters in the case had not been pre-judged and she and her staff have not engaged with the media.
Why it matters
This is the latest development in an ongoing legal battle between Bevin and his adopted son, Jonah, who is seeking retroactive child support from his parents. The case has drawn significant public attention, with the Bevins arguing their divorce proceedings should be kept private, while the court has ruled that Jonah has a right to intervene.
The details
Bevin and his ex-wife, Glenna, both filed affidavits asking Jefferson Family Court Judge Angela Johnson to disqualify herself from the case, in which their adopted son, Jonah Bevin, has filed for retroactive child support. Bevin argued the court 'has pre-judged issues before it,' and that Johnson has been motivated by media attention when ruling in the case. However, the judge disagreed, saying the matters in the case had not been pre-judged before hearings and she and her staff has not engaged with the media.
- In March 2025, Matt and Glenna Bevin's divorce was finalized.
- A month later, in April 2025, Jonah Bevin filed to intervene in their divorce case, asking for retroactive child support and financial assistance.
- In October 2025, the Court of Appeals denied the request to seal the proceedings, and ruled that Jonah Bevin had a right to intervene in the case.
- In March 2026, the former governor was held in contempt of court for repeatedly failing to provide his personal financial information as part of the divorce and child support case.
The players
Matt Bevin
The former governor of Kentucky who is involved in a child support and custody case with his adopted son, Jonah Bevin.
Glenna Bevin
The ex-wife of former Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin, who is also involved in the child support and custody case with their adopted son, Jonah Bevin.
Jonah Bevin
The adopted son of former Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin and his ex-wife Glenna, who has filed for retroactive child support and financial assistance.
Angela J. Johnson
The Jefferson Family Court judge overseeing the child support and custody case between Matt Bevin, Glenna Bevin, and their son Jonah Bevin.
What they’re saying
“By disqualifying herself when no grounds to do so apply, this Court would be improperly avoiding her duty to render a decision in a matter assigned to her. This Court has a duty to hear both sides and render a decision consistent with the law and the facts before it.”
— Angela J. Johnson, Jefferson Family Court Judge
What’s next
The Kentucky Supreme Court has remanded the decision for Judge Johnson's recusal back to her court, so the next step will be for her to make a final ruling on whether she will remain on the case.
The takeaway
This case highlights the complexities and sensitivities involved when high-profile public figures like former governors become embroiled in family court disputes, and the challenges courts face in balancing privacy concerns with the public's right to information.





