Judge Partially Blocks Lil Durk's Lyrics in Murder-for-Hire Trial

Prosecutors' use of rap lyrics as evidence sparks debate over artistic freedom and criminal justice.

Published on Feb. 10, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A federal judge has ruled that some lyrics from Lil Durk's song 'Hanging with Wolves' will be inadmissible in his upcoming murder-for-hire trial, specifically those suggesting an intent to flee. However, the broader question of whether his lyrics and music videos can be used as evidence against him remains unresolved, highlighting a growing trend of prosecutors utilizing rap lyrics in criminal cases.

Why it matters

The case has ignited a crucial debate about the line between artistic expression and criminal evidence. Prosecutors are increasingly attempting to leverage rap lyrics as proof of a defendant's mindset or affiliations, arguing the lyrics offer insight into their alleged crimes. This tactic has sparked widespread criticism from artists, legal scholars, and civil rights advocates who argue it violates First Amendment rights and introduces undue prejudice.

The details

In Lil Durk's case, prosecutors aim to demonstrate he 'used his money for violence' as the alleged leader of his collective, Only The Family (OTF). The judge's decision to exclude specific lyrics from 'Hanging with Wolves' that relate to fleeing the country represents a partial victory for the defense, who argued those lyrics were not indicative of guilt but rather a general propensity. However, the court is still considering whether other lyrics and music videos can be admitted, particularly those prosecutors believe demonstrate Durk's involvement in a conspiracy.

  • The federal judge made the ruling on February 10, 2026.

The players

Lil Durk

A rapper facing murder-for-hire charges, whose lyrics and music videos are at the center of the trial.

Marissa Goldberg

Lil Durk's defense attorney, who argued that prosecutors are 'cherry-picking' inflammatory material from his lyrics while ignoring the broader artistic context.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident (San Francisco Chronicle)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow additional lyrics and music videos from Lil Durk to be admitted as evidence.

The takeaway

This case highlights the growing debate over the use of rap lyrics as evidence in criminal trials, raising concerns about the potential for racial bias and the stifling of artistic freedom. The outcome could set an important precedent for how courts approach the intersection of law and creative expression.