Illinois Committee Criticized for 'Elitist' Stance on Gun Ownership Costs

Proposed RIFL Act could add thousands in taxes, pricing out lower-income buyers, opponents say

Apr. 13, 2026 at 7:21pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

An abstract, fragmented painting featuring overlapping geometric shapes in shades of grey, blue, and red, conceptually representing the divisive political tensions around a proposed gun control bill.A fractured, avant-garde painting captures the heated political debate over gun control legislation that could price lower-income residents out of firearm ownership.Batavia Today

A proposed Illinois bill known as the Responsibility in Firearms Legislation (RIFL) Act is facing criticism from gun owners who say it would price lower-income individuals out of exercising their Second Amendment rights. Advocates of the bill, like Dr. Anthony Douglas, have argued that 'poor people don't benefit from owning firearms,' while opponents like State Rep. Patrick Windhorst have called this an 'elitist opinion' that goes against the constitutional guarantee of the right to bear arms.

Why it matters

The debate over the RIFL Act highlights the ongoing tensions between gun control measures and the constitutional protections of the Second Amendment. Critics argue the bill's potential to significantly increase the cost of gun ownership would disproportionately impact lower-income individuals, raising concerns about equitable access to firearms for self-defense.

The details

The RIFL Act proposes adding thousands of dollars in taxes and fees to the purchase of a single firearm, with estimates ranging up to an extra $2,200 per gun. Supporters of the bill, like Robyn Thomas of the Community Violence Legal Network, claim the legislation would withstand constitutional challenges, while opponents like lobbyist Ed Sullivan argue the 'exorbitant fee per gun' could violate the Supreme Court's recent Bruen decision.

  • The RIFL Act was heard in committee on Wednesday, but no vote was taken and the bill has not yet advanced.
  • Illinois legislators are scheduled to return to the state capitol on Tuesday.

The players

Dr. Anthony Douglas

An advocate for the RIFL Act who stated that 'poor people don't benefit from owning firearms' and would be better served by 'access to education, access to resources.'

State Rep. Patrick Windhorst

A Republican state representative who criticized the 'elitist opinion' expressed by the committee, arguing that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to bear arms for people of all income levels.

State Rep. Maura Hirschauer

The Democratic chairwoman of the House Gun Violence Prevention Task Force, who stated that the goal of the committee is to reduce gun violence.

Robyn Thomas

Representing the Community Violence Legal Network, she claimed the RIFL Act would withstand constitutional challenges.

Ed Sullivan

A lobbyist representing several Second Amendment organizations, who estimated the RIFL Act could add an extra $2,200 per gun, potentially violating the Supreme Court's Bruen decision.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“I think poor people don't benefit from owning firearms. I think more people benefit from access to education, access to resources.”

— Dr. Anthony Douglas

“The Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States guarantees that to them. And it's really not our place to say, 'well, we think you're better off not having this thing,' which is the tone of this committee.”

— State Rep. Patrick Windhorst, R-Harrisburg

“We have done a thorough legal analysis of all possible legal issues, and concluded that the legislation passes muster on all fronts.”

— Robyn Thomas, Community Violence Legal Network

“That might fall under an exorbitant fee per gun, under the Bruen constitutional challenge.”

— Ed Sullivan, Lobbyist

What’s next

Illinois legislators are scheduled to return to the state capitol on Tuesday, and gun owners plan to rally and lobby for Illinois Gun Owner Lobby Day on Wednesday, where the RIFL Act is expected to be a key focus.

The takeaway

The debate over the RIFL Act highlights the ongoing tensions between gun control measures and the constitutional protections of the Second Amendment. Critics argue the bill's potential to significantly increase the cost of gun ownership would disproportionately impact lower-income individuals, raising concerns about equitable access to firearms for self-defense.