BYU-Idaho Embraces AI While Safeguarding Student Learning

University implements 'stoplight' framework to guide appropriate AI use in coursework

Apr. 14, 2026 at 9:00pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A vibrant, pop art-inspired illustration featuring a laptop computer icon repeated in a grid pattern, conceptually representing the integration of AI technology into the academic experience at BYU-Idaho.BYU-Idaho embraces AI as a tool to enhance student learning, not replace it, with a clear framework to guide appropriate use.Rexburg Today

Artificial intelligence is becoming a regular part of life at Brigham Young University-Idaho, with students and professors using AI tools for brainstorming, revising, and teaching. However, the university is grappling with how to ensure AI strengthens learning rather than replaces it, especially when it comes to academic integrity and writing assignments that require personal interpretation and voice.

Why it matters

As generative AI tools become more advanced and widely available, universities everywhere are having to respond to concerns about academic integrity and the risk of AI replacing student learning. BYU-Idaho's approach of implementing a clear 'stoplight' framework to guide appropriate AI use in coursework could serve as a model for other institutions navigating this challenge.

The details

BYU-Idaho AI officer Sidney Palmer says the university faced an immediate 'crisis point' when generative AI tools became widely available, as professors and administrators had to figure out how to address concerns about academic integrity. However, the real challenge has become ensuring students still learn the skills their classes are designed to teach, especially for writing assignments that require processing ideas, making connections, and developing original thought. English professor Samuel Head explains that AI detection software can produce false positives, leading some students to be afraid of writing well. But faculty member Kathy Schmid says the goal is not to punish students, but to have conversations about appropriate AI use. To help guide this, the university adopted a 'stoplight' framework where green means AI is allowed (usually for brainstorming or feedback), yellow means use caution, and red means AI should not be used at all.

  • In 2026, generative AI tools became widely available and BYU-Idaho had to respond to concerns about academic integrity.
  • Earlier this semester, the author experienced their assignment being flagged as 100% AI-generated, even though they had not used AI.

The players

Sidney Palmer

BYU-Idaho AI officer who says the university faced an immediate 'crisis point' when generative AI tools became widely available.

Samuel Head

English professor who has been studying AI detection software and how it affects students.

Kathy Schmid

Faculty member who teaches film and art analysis and says the goal is not to punish students, but to have conversations about appropriate AI use.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Every, every school faces that. That's the first crisis point for generative AI, and we were no different.”

— Sidney Palmer, BYU-Idaho AI officer

“It's not like AI leaves some sort of signature in the code embedded in the text in some way that says it's AI. That doesn't happen.”

— Samuel Head, English professor

“We were counseled not to just to not accuse, but to reach out and say, 'Hey, this was flagged, can you get back to me as soon as possible and to discuss it?'”

— Kathy Schmid, Faculty member

What’s next

BYU-Idaho plans to continue refining its 'stoplight' framework and communication with students to ensure AI is used responsibly to support learning, not replace it.

The takeaway

BYU-Idaho's approach to navigating the rise of generative AI in higher education, with a focus on clear policies, open communication, and using AI as a tool to enhance rather than replace student learning, could serve as a model for other universities facing similar challenges.