Iowa Bill Aims to Revoke Educator Licenses Over Posts 'Celebrating' Kirk's Death

Measure faces criticism from education advocates over free speech concerns

Published on Feb. 11, 2026

A bill in the Iowa legislature proposes revoking or denying educator licenses and certificates for people found 'publicly celebrating' politically motivated violence, including the death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The bill has drawn criticism from education advocates who argue it violates the U.S. Constitution's free speech protections.

Why it matters

This bill highlights the ongoing tensions between protecting public safety and upholding free speech rights, particularly for public employees like educators. The retroactive nature of the proposed law and its focus on a specific individual raise concerns about its constitutionality and consistency.

The details

The bill, House Study Bill 682, directs the Iowa Board of Educational Examiners to disqualify an applicant for a license or certificate, or revoke these credentials if already granted, for people 'publicly celebrating any act of politically motivated violence, including the unlawful killing of Charles J. Kirk.' The board would be required to begin the proceedings for revoking or disqualifying a person's licensing 'upon receipt of credible evidence,' which includes screenshots, videos and sworn complaints.

  • The bill would be effective retroactively, beginning September 10, 2025 — the day Kirk was fatally shot during an event at Utah Valley University.

The players

Iowa Board of Educational Examiners

The state agency that oversees educator licensing and certification.

Charles J. Kirk

A conservative activist who was fatally shot during an event at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025.

Katherine Mejia

A teacher in Manchester, Iowa who was allegedly fired or sanctioned over online posts related to Kirk's death.

Jennifer Smith

A teacher in Johnston, Iowa who was allegedly fired or sanctioned over online posts related to Kirk's death.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident (San Francisco Chronicle)

“Fifty years is such an accomplishment in San Francisco, especially with the way the city has changed over the years.”

— Gordon Edgar, grocery employee (Instagram)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.