Pinellas Park Officer-Involved Shooting Deemed Justified

State Attorney's Office clears law enforcement in March 31 incident.

Apr. 17, 2026 at 7:00pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

An extreme close-up photograph of a police badge or handcuffs against a pitch-black background, the harsh flash creating dramatic shadows and textures to convey a sense of the gravity and complexity of officer-involved shootings.A harsh, uncompromising visual investigation into the use of force by law enforcement.Pinellas Park Today

The Pinellas County Sheriff's Office has announced that the State Attorney's Office has determined an officer-involved shooting that occurred on March 31 in Pinellas Park was justified. The incident began when 34-year-old Ryan Lecompte barricaded himself inside a residence on Briar Ridge Court North, prompting a SWAT team response.

Why it matters

Officer-involved shootings are a sensitive and controversial issue, so the determination of justification by the State Attorney's Office is significant in providing transparency and accountability around the use of force by law enforcement in this case.

The details

According to authorities, after SWAT teams were called to the scene, a standoff ensued before Lecompte allegedly threatened officers, leading to the fatal shooting. The State Attorney's Office has now concluded the officers' actions were legally justified given the threat posed by Lecompte.

  • The incident occurred on March 31, 2026.
  • The State Attorney's Office announced its finding of justification on April 17, 2026.

The players

Pinellas County Sheriff's Office

The local law enforcement agency that responded to the incident and requested the State Attorney's review.

Ryan Lecompte

A 34-year-old man who barricaded himself inside a Pinellas Park residence, leading to the officer-involved shooting.

State Attorney's Office

The local prosecutorial agency that reviewed the incident and determined the officers' actions were legally justified.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

The takeaway

This case highlights the importance of thorough investigations and transparency around officer-involved shootings in order to maintain public trust in law enforcement, while also recognizing the difficult split-second decisions officers sometimes face in potentially life-threatening situations.