Trinidad Chambliss' Attorneys File Response vs NCAA Over Appeal Denial

The former Indiana Hoosiers player is seeking reinstatement after being denied a medical redshirt in 2022.

Published on Feb. 8, 2026

The legal representation for former Indiana Hoosiers football player Trinidad Chambliss has filed a response against the NCAA over the denial of his appeal for a medical redshirt in the 2022 season. Chambliss was seeking the redshirt after missing most of the season due to injury, but the NCAA denied his request.

Why it matters

This case highlights the ongoing challenges student-athletes face in navigating the NCAA's complex rules around medical redshirts and eligibility. Chambliss' situation shines a light on the need for more transparency and fairness in the NCAA's appeals process.

The details

Chambliss, a wide receiver for the Indiana Hoosiers, was seeking a medical redshirt for the 2022 season after missing most of the year due to an injury. However, the NCAA denied his appeal for the redshirt, which would have allowed him an additional year of eligibility. Chambliss' legal team has now filed a response challenging the NCAA's decision.

  • Chambliss missed most of the 2022 season due to injury.
  • The NCAA denied Chambliss' appeal for a medical redshirt in 2022.
  • Chambliss' attorneys have now filed a response against the NCAA over the denied appeal.

The players

Trinidad Chambliss

A former wide receiver for the Indiana Hoosiers football team who is seeking reinstatement after being denied a medical redshirt for the 2022 season.

NCAA

The governing body for collegiate athletics in the United States, which denied Chambliss' appeal for a medical redshirt.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We believe the NCAA's decision was unfair and we are fighting to have Trinidad's eligibility reinstated.”

— Chambliss' Attorney (Unnamed Source)

What’s next

The case will now proceed through the legal system as Chambliss' attorneys challenge the NCAA's denial of his medical redshirt appeal.

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing tensions between student-athletes and the NCAA over issues of fairness and transparency in the eligibility and appeals process. It underscores the need for the NCAA to re-evaluate its policies to better support injured players seeking additional years of eligibility.