Shanna Gardner's lawyers seek to suppress wiretap evidence in Bridegan murder case

Defense argues detectives lacked probable cause for original and follow-up wiretaps

Apr. 19, 2026 at 9:37am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

An extreme close-up of a shattered cell phone screen, the harsh lighting and dramatic shadows conveying a sense of tension and urgency surrounding the evidence in this high-profile case.As the legal battle over wiretap evidence escalates, this stark image of a damaged smartphone screen reflects the high-stakes nature of the Bridegan murder investigation.Today in Jacksonville

Attorneys for Shanna Gardner, a suspect in the Jared Bridegan murder case, have filed a motion to suppress wiretap evidence gathered by Jacksonville Beach police. They argue detectives relied on speculation, misinterpreted conversations, and lacked probable cause to obtain the original and follow-up wiretaps, which they say should be invalidated before trial.

Why it matters

This case has garnered significant public attention, and the admissibility of key evidence like wiretaps could have a major impact on the prosecution's case against Gardner. The outcome of this motion could shape the trajectory of the high-profile murder trial.

The details

Gardner's defense team claims the wiretaps were obtained without proper justification, alleging detectives lacked sufficient evidence of criminal activity to establish probable cause. They argue the recordings captured innocuous conversations that were misconstrued as incriminating.

  • The defense motion was filed in Duval County court on April 18, 2026.

The players

Shanna Gardner

A suspect in the Jared Bridegan murder case who is seeking to have wiretap evidence suppressed.

Jared Bridegan

The victim in the high-profile murder case that has garnered significant public attention.

Jacksonville Beach Police

The law enforcement agency that obtained the wiretap evidence that is now being challenged by the defense.

Duval County Court

The court that will rule on the defense's motion to suppress the wiretap evidence.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow the wiretap evidence to be admitted at trial.

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing legal battles over the admissibility of surveillance evidence, as defense attorneys seek to challenge the methods used by law enforcement to gather information. The outcome could have significant implications for the prosecution's case against Gardner.