- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Justice Jackson Criticizes Supreme Court's 'Oblivious' Emergency Orders
The liberal justice delivered a lengthy assessment of the court's recent approach to granting emergency stays for controversial presidential policies.
Apr. 15, 2026 at 7:21pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The Supreme Court's increasing reliance on rushed, ideologically-driven emergency orders has drawn sharp criticism from liberal justices like Ketanji Brown Jackson.New Haven TodayIn a speech at Yale Law School, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson sharply criticized the court's conservative majority for issuing a series of emergency orders that allowed former President Trump to implement controversial policies even when lower courts had found them to be likely illegal. Jackson said the court's 'back-of-the-envelope, first-blush impressions' on such matters 'ring hollow' and fail to acknowledge the real-world impact on people's lives.
Why it matters
Jackson's public rebuke of the court's emergency order practices is highly unusual, as justices typically keep such internal disagreements private. Her comments highlight growing concerns about the court's willingness to intervene early in legal challenges to high-profile policies, often siding with the executive branch over other branches of government.
The details
In her hour-long speech, Jackson said the court's emergency orders are often issued with little explanation, and then lower courts are expected to apply those 'scratch-paper musings' in other cases. She also pushed back on the court's view that preventing a president from implementing a policy is itself a harm that often outweighs the harm to those challenging the policy. 'The president of the United States, though he may be harmed in an abstract way, he certainly isn't harmed if what he wants to do is illegal,' Jackson said.
- On April 11, 2026, Justice Jackson delivered a speech at Yale Law School.
- Last week, Justice Sonia Sotomayor also criticized the court's emergency order practices at an event at the University of Alabama.
The players
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson
A liberal justice on the U.S. Supreme Court who has frequently dissented from the court's conservative majority on emergency order decisions.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor
A liberal justice on the U.S. Supreme Court who has also criticized the court's approach to emergency orders.
Justice Elena Kagan
A liberal justice on the U.S. Supreme Court who has often joined Jackson and Sotomayor in dissenting from the court's emergency order decisions.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh
A conservative justice on the U.S. Supreme Court who has been part of the court's majority in issuing controversial emergency orders.
Former President Donald Trump
The former U.S. president whose controversial policies were allowed to be implemented through the Supreme Court's emergency orders, even when lower courts found them likely illegal.
What they’re saying
“The president of the United States, though he may be harmed in an abstract way, he certainly isn't harmed if what he wants to do is illegal.”
— Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Supreme Court Justice
“There is value in avoiding having the court continually touching the third rail of every divisive policy issue in American life.”
— Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Supreme Court Justice
What’s next
Justice Jackson said there have been internal discussions among the justices about the court's emergency order practices, and she hopes her public comments will 'be a catalyst for change'.
The takeaway
Justice Jackson's unusually public criticism of the Supreme Court's conservative majority highlights growing concerns about the court's willingness to intervene early in legal challenges to high-profile policies, often siding with the executive branch over other branches of government.





