Pasadena Pauses Hydrogen Fueling Station Contract Amid Uncertainty

City Council cites concerns over 'green' hydrogen supply and shifting market toward battery-electric vehicles.

Apr. 14, 2026 at 11:08am

A highly detailed, glowing 3D illustration of a complex hydrogen fuel cell powertrain system, with neon cyan and magenta lights illuminating the intricate array of pipes, valves, and electronic components, conceptually representing the technical complexity and energy-intensive nature of hydrogen fuel technology.As Pasadena weighs the future of its hydrogen fueling station project, the technical challenges of this energy-intensive technology are brought to light.Pasadena Today

The Pasadena City Council has paused consideration of a $316,800 contract with Stantec Consulting Services Inc. to support the bidding and construction of a planned hydrogen fueling station. The project is part of the city's effort to transition its transit fleet to zero-emission vehicles, but Councilmember Rick Cole raised concerns about the long-term viability and environmental benefits of hydrogen fuel technology amid a shifting market toward battery-electric alternatives.

Why it matters

Pasadena's hydrogen fueling station project is a key component of the city's broader climate goals to reduce emissions from its public transit system. However, the proposal has come under scrutiny as some officials and community groups question whether hydrogen fuel remains a viable path forward, particularly as battery-electric vehicles continue to gain traction.

The details

The proposed $316,800 contract would have supported the bidding and construction administration for the planned hydrogen fueling station, which is intended to serve Pasadena Transit's transition to zero-emission buses. However, Councilmember Rick Cole requested the City Council pause consideration of the contract due to growing concerns over the long-term supply of 'green' hydrogen and the broader market shift toward battery-electric systems. Cole cited the cancellation of more than $1 billion in funding for the planned ARCHES hydrogen hub as a key factor in his concerns about the project's viability.

  • On April 14, 2026, the Pasadena City Council paused consideration of the $316,800 contract.
  • The hydrogen fueling station project is part of Pasadena Transit's broader effort to transition its fleet to zero-emission vehicles.

The players

Rick Cole

A Pasadena City Councilmember who requested the city pause consideration of the hydrogen fueling station contract due to concerns over the long-term viability of hydrogen fuel technology.

Victor Gordo

The Mayor of Pasadena.

Matt Hawkesworth

The Acting City Manager of Pasadena.

Stantec Consulting Services Inc.

A consulting firm that was set to receive a $316,800 contract from the city to support the bidding and construction of the planned hydrogen fueling station.

Pasadena Transit

The city's public transit agency that is working to transition its fleet to zero-emission vehicles, including through the planned hydrogen fueling station project.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The landscape has changed dramatically under the Trump Administration. The supply of truly 'green' hydrogen is now clearly highly uncertain. Major supporting investments have stalled, and the broader market is shifting toward battery-electric systems.”

— Rick Cole, Pasadena City Councilmember

“Without a robust green hydrogen supply chain, the environmental benefits disappear—effectively substituting one fossil-fuel-dependent system for another, at costs that could ultimately force service reductions.”

— Rick Cole, Pasadena City Councilmember

What’s next

The Pasadena City Council is expected to further weigh the contract approval against the uncertainties surrounding hydrogen fuel technology and consider how best to meet the city's zero-emission transit goals.

The takeaway

Pasadena's pause on the hydrogen fueling station contract highlights the broader debate over the long-term viability of hydrogen fuel cell technology for public transit, particularly as battery-electric alternatives continue to gain momentum. The city's decision reflects the need to carefully evaluate emerging clean energy solutions to ensure they align with local climate priorities and remain cost-effective for taxpayers.