Pasadena City Council Responds to Proposed Wildfire Buffer Rules

City seeks more flexibility in state's 'Zone Zero' vegetation management standards

Apr. 14, 2026 at 11:08am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A serene oil painting depicting a lone tree or shrub in a residential neighborhood, with warm sunlight casting deep shadows across the scene, conceptually representing the tension between fire safety and preserving Pasadena's natural character.Pasadena's urban forests and gardens face an uncertain future as state officials weigh new wildfire prevention rules that could reshape the city's iconic landscapes.Pasadena Today

The Pasadena City Council has approved a formal response to proposed state regulations that would require strict vegetation restrictions within five feet of homes in high fire hazard areas. The city is advocating for a more flexible approach, arguing that a 'one-size-fits-all' policy is not beneficial and that local control needs to be maintained to provide regulations that work for Pasadena's unique urban conditions.

Why it matters

The proposed 'Zone Zero' rules aim to create ember-resistant areas around structures to reduce wildfire risk, but many Pasadena residents have voiced concerns about the potential costs, environmental impacts, and loss of local control over their neighborhoods' character and landscapes.

The details

The city is backing the least restrictive of the state's proposed vegetation and tree management standards, while stressing the need for local discretion in how the rules are applied. Residents have argued that the regulations may not significantly reduce wildfire risk while imposing financial burdens, and have advocated for alternative strategies like improved early detection systems and enhanced emergency response capabilities.

  • The proposed regulations stem from a 2020 state law requiring defensible space around homes in high fire hazard areas.
  • The rules were initially expected to take effect in 2023, but remain under review by the state, with adoption now anticipated later this year.
  • If adopted statewide, the Zone Zero regulations would require new properties to comply immediately, with existing homes given up to three years to meet the standards.

The players

Victor Gordo

The mayor of Pasadena, who will send a letter to the California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection supporting a more flexible approach to the 'Zone Zero' rules.

Christine Olsen

A longtime Pasadena homeowner who lives in a 'very high wildfire hazard' area and urged the city to maintain local control over enforcement with sufficient flexibility.

Terry Krupczak

A Pasadena resident who stressed the importance of maintaining vegetation and trees as part of the city's landscape.

Sarah Gavit and Andre de Salis

Pasadena residents who warned that the proposed vegetation removal requirements may not significantly reduce wildfire risk while imposing financial burdens on homeowners.

Liza Billington

A Pasadena resident who argued that the 'Zone 0' regulations are not supported by science and would not prevent future devastating fires.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“I strongly urge you to authorize the mayor to send a letter … supporting local control over enforcement with sufficient local flexibility.”

— Christine Olsen, Pasadena homeowner

“I believe it is very important to keep the character of our city with beautiful landscapes and trees.”

— Terry Krupczak, Pasadena resident

“The proposed regulations to denude numerous properties of vegetation is not a reasonable approach to solving California's fire management issues.”

— Sarah Gavit and Andre de Salis, Pasadena residents

“Zone 0 is not supported by science and would not prevent future devastating fires.”

— Liza Billington, Pasadena resident

What’s next

The council's action would not directly implement the regulations but would instead communicate Pasadena's position to state officials as they finalize the rules. If adopted statewide, the Zone Zero regulations would require new properties to comply immediately, with existing homes given up to three years to meet the standards.

The takeaway

This debate highlights the tension between state-level wildfire prevention policies and the desire for local control and flexibility to address the unique needs and characteristics of Pasadena's urban environment. The city is advocating for a balanced approach that maintains fire safety while preserving the city's landscapes and neighborhood character.