Majority of L.A. Residents Dissatisfied as Mayoral Election Nears

UCLA study shows historic low in quality of life ratings amid challenges like wildfires and immigration fears

Apr. 18, 2026 at 4:55am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A serene, cinematic painting of the Los Angeles City Hall building, its grand architecture bathed in warm, golden light and deep shadows, conveying a sense of civic pride and nostalgia amidst the city's current challenges.As Los Angeles residents grapple with declining quality of life, the upcoming mayoral election looms large with an unsettled race and high voter uncertainty.Los Angeles Today

A new UCLA study surveying 1,400 Los Angeles County residents found that a majority are 'less satisfied' with their quality of life as the mayoral election approaches. The overall quality of life index dropped to a historic low, with steep declines in areas like education, transportation, and cost of living. Top concerns include fears of deportation and dissatisfaction with wildfire relief efforts under current Mayor Karen Bass, who still leads the mayoral race but with a large bloc of undecided voters.

Why it matters

The study highlights deep dissatisfaction among Los Angeles residents as they prepare to vote in the upcoming mayoral election, with key issues like affordability, infrastructure, and disaster response weighing heavily on their minds. The fluid nature of the race suggests voters are still evaluating their options, making this an important bellwether for the direction the city may take.

The details

The UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs survey of 1,400 L.A. County residents between March 15-29 found the overall quality of life index dropped to a historic low of 52, with six of the nine categories that comprise the index also falling to their lowest levels on record. The top issues were fears of deportation (31%), income loss due to wildfires (26%), and dissatisfaction with wildfire relief efforts (56%). Despite the challenges, a majority of respondents (53%) said they were optimistic about their own economic future in L.A. County.

  • The survey was conducted between March 15-29, 2026.
  • The Los Angeles mayoral primary election is scheduled for June 2026.

The players

Karen Bass

The current mayor of Los Angeles, a Democrat, who leads the mayoral race but with a low approval rating and a large bloc of undecided voters.

Spencer Pratt

A former reality TV star who is the second-place candidate in the mayoral race according to the survey.

Nithya Raman

A candidate in the mayoral race who is in third place according to the survey.

Zev Yaroslavsky

The director of the Los Angeles Initiative at UCLA Luskin, who commented on the survey findings.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Los Angeles County residents' rating of their quality of life has been in decline since the peak of the COVID pandemic. We've been through a lot in the last five years. COVID, increases in the cost of living, immigration sweeps, and the Altadena and Palisades fires have taken their toll on virtually every aspect of our lives.”

— Zev Yaroslavsky, Director, Los Angeles Initiative at UCLA Luskin

“Despite the challenges county residents have faced, when asked if they were generally optimistic or pessimistic about their own economic future in Los Angeles County, a majority of survey respondents (53%) said they were optimistic.”

— Zev Yaroslavsky, Director, Los Angeles Initiative at UCLA Luskin

What’s next

The Los Angeles mayoral primary election is scheduled for June 2026, and the results of this survey suggest a highly unsettled race with a large bloc of undecided voters. The performance of the candidates, particularly Mayor Karen Bass, in addressing the key issues raised in the survey will likely be a major factor in determining the outcome.

The takeaway

This survey highlights the deep dissatisfaction and uncertainty among Los Angeles residents as they approach a pivotal mayoral election. The next mayor will face significant challenges in restoring confidence and improving quality of life on issues like affordability, infrastructure, and disaster response. Voters appear to be still evaluating their options, making this a critical juncture for the future direction of the city.