Divisions Deepen at LA City Hall Over Venice Homeless Encampment

Debate over enforcement efforts and shelter options as city plans to clear contentious site

Apr. 16, 2026 at 6:04am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A solitary shopping cart filled with personal belongings sits on a dimly lit city street, casting long shadows in the warm, golden light, conveying a sense of isolation and the struggle of homelessness.The Venice homeless encampment highlights the human toll and complex challenges of addressing homelessness in Los Angeles.Los Angeles Today

A homeless encampment in Venice is exposing sharp divisions among Los Angeles city leaders and mayoral candidates over how to address homelessness. Residents say the conditions have become unsafe, while some officials argue that enforcement efforts merely displace the problem. The city plans to clear the encampment, though some unhoused individuals remain hesitant about shelter options.

Why it matters

The Venice encampment highlights the ongoing challenges LA faces in balancing public safety concerns with providing adequate housing and services for the unhoused population. The debate also reflects broader political divisions among city leaders on homelessness policy as the mayoral election approaches.

The details

The encampment, located at the intersection of Rose and Main in Venice, has become a flashpoint, with residents reporting issues like crime and safety concerns. The area falls within Councilwoman Traci Park's district, where police responded to nearly 40 calls last year. The city council recently voted to ban camping at the location, though the measure faced opposition from Councilmember and mayoral candidate Nithya Raman, who argued it would simply displace the problem. Outreach teams have repeatedly offered services to the unhoused individuals, but some, like a man who goes by 'Street 2 Street', remain hesitant about shelter options.

  • In 2022, police responded to nearly 40 calls at the Venice encampment location.
  • On April 12, 2026, the Los Angeles City Council voted to ban camping at the Venice intersection under municipal code 41.18.
  • On April 16, 2026, city crews are scheduled to clear the encampment, with outreach teams offering shelter and services.

The players

Traci Park

Los Angeles City Councilwoman representing the district where the Venice encampment is located.

Nithya Raman

Los Angeles City Councilmember and mayoral candidate who voted against the measure to ban camping at the Venice site.

Karen Bass

Mayor of Los Angeles, whose office criticized Raman's vote against the camping ban.

Street 2 Street

A man living at the Venice encampment who is open to alternatives but not shelters.

Michael

A neighbor who says he witnessed a shooting at the encampment location.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Just mayhem — I watched a guy get shot and killed across the street.”

— Michael, Neighbor

“It's not like I feel safe enough to just go and stroll by myself. I'll choose not to.”

— Unnamed woman, Neighbor

“This is who she is. Councilmember Raman opposes the law prohibiting encampments next to schools and has voted against hundreds of cleanups. This is just another example of her taking us backward.”

— Karen Bass' office

“This part of 41.18 duplicates laws we already have to regulate camping and, at best, succeeds in moving homelessness around a neighborhood.”

— Nithya Raman, Los Angeles City Councilmember and Mayoral Candidate

“Me and shelters don't do each other.”

— Street 2 Street, Unhoused Resident at Venice Encampment

What’s next

City crews are scheduled to clear the Venice encampment on April 16, 2026, with outreach teams expected to again offer shelter and services to the unhoused individuals.

The takeaway

The Venice homeless encampment has become a flashpoint in the broader debate over homelessness in Los Angeles, exposing divisions among city leaders on how to balance public safety concerns with providing adequate housing and services. As the mayoral election approaches, the handling of this issue will likely be a key point of contention.