Age Verification Laws Raise Privacy Concerns Nationwide

Mandatory age checks on websites and apps spark debate over data security and free speech online

Apr. 15, 2026 at 10:10pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A highly detailed, glowing 3D illustration of a futuristic age verification system, with neon cyan and magenta lights illuminating the complex digital infrastructure, conceptually representing the technical challenges and privacy concerns around mandatory online age checks.The technical complexities and privacy risks of mandatory age verification systems raise concerns about their effectiveness and impact on digital rights.Los Angeles Today

Legislative efforts to require age verification on websites and apps are gaining traction across the U.S., with supporters arguing the rules are necessary to protect children from harmful content. However, critics warn that age verification could undermine privacy and free expression online, as it would require the collection and storage of personal data that could be vulnerable to data breaches.

Why it matters

The push for mandatory age verification online highlights the ongoing tension between child safety and digital rights. While proponents believe age checks can shield minors, opponents argue that the potential privacy and security risks outweigh the benefits, and that there are better ways to protect kids online without compromising anonymity and free speech.

The details

Several states have passed laws mandating some form of age verification, and the bipartisan Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act introduced in Congress would require platforms to deploy age checks in certain cases. Some online services have already implemented their own age assurance systems, but these have faced backlash from users reporting inaccurate results or finding ways to bypass the restrictions. Digital rights advocates warn that age verification could chill certain types of speech, like whistleblower reports and discussions of sensitive topics.

  • In March 2026, the bipartisan Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act was introduced in Congress.
  • In January 2026, Roblox began requiring biometric age checks to access chat, leading to user complaints about inaccurate estimates and bypassing the system.
  • In 2026, Australia implemented a social media ban for users under 16, which many continue to get around.

The players

Eric Goldman

A professor at Santa Clara University School of Law who focuses on internet law.

Aaron Mackey

The deputy legal director of the nonprofit Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Iain Corby

The executive director of the Age Verification Providers Association, which lobbies on behalf of age assurance technology developers.

Tony Evers

The governor of Wisconsin, who shut down a bill that would have required users to submit government ID to access porn sites in the state.

Christopher Mufarrige

The director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, who said age verification technologies are 'some of the most child-protective technologies to emerge in decades.'

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Every single time an age authentication mandate goes into effect, the internet shrinks some.”

— Eric Goldman, Professor, Santa Clara University School of Law

“We already know that the online ecosystem is porous, insecure and routinely subject to data breaches. So why would we, then, in the name of protecting people, create a whole other legal mandate that requires the collection and storage of even more personally identifying information that would be subject to either data thieves or data breaches?”

— Aaron Mackey, Deputy Legal Director, Electronic Frontier Foundation

“While I agree that we should protect children from harmful material, this bill imposes an intrusive burden on adults who are trying to access constitutionally protected materials. I'm concerned about data security and the potential for misuse of personally identifiable information.”

— Tony Evers, Governor of Wisconsin

“Age verification technologies are some of the most child-protective technologies to emerge in decades.”

— Christopher Mufarrige, Director, FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection

“I'm a gay man, and I've had LGBT groups in different states up in arms, and I've had to go and see them and say, 'Look, I wouldn't be supporting this if I thought it's a problem for us.' Now, that doesn't mean to say that you can't do age verification badly and you can't design it maliciously. That's why we want lots of regulation, audits, certifications, checking against standards, that sort of thing, in the same way as your bank is regulated.”

— Iain Corby, Executive Director, Age Verification Providers Association

What’s next

The bipartisan Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act is currently being considered in Congress, and if passed, would require platforms to implement age verification measures. Additionally, more states are expected to introduce and pass their own age verification laws in the coming years, leading to a patchwork of regulations that companies will have to navigate.

The takeaway

The push for mandatory age verification online highlights the ongoing tension between protecting children and preserving digital rights and privacy. While proponents argue age checks are necessary to shield minors, critics warn that the potential risks to privacy, security, and free expression outweigh the benefits. As more states and the federal government consider age verification laws, the debate over the best way to keep kids safe online will likely continue.