Hillary Clinton Defends Democrats' Immigration Record, But History Tells a Different Story

Clinton claimed Democrats had a more 'humane' approach, but a closer look reveals harsh policies under Clinton and Obama administrations.

Published on Mar. 2, 2026

In a speech at the Munich Security Conference, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claimed that more people were deported under her husband Bill Clinton's and President Barack Obama's administrations than under former President Donald Trump, and that their policies were more 'humane.' However, a review of the historical record shows that the Clinton and Obama administrations implemented harsh immigration enforcement measures that led to increased migrant deaths and family separations.

Why it matters

Clinton's comments reflect an ongoing debate over the immigration policies of Democratic and Republican administrations. As the 2024 presidential election approaches, her remarks could be seen as positioning herself for another run. This story examines the factual accuracy of Clinton's claims and provides context around the immigration enforcement actions taken by past Democratic presidents.

The details

The Clinton administration implemented an immigration enforcement strategy known as 'prevention through deterrence' in 1994, which resulted in the construction of miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border and increased personnel at major points of entry. This led to an increase in migrant deaths, with the Congressional Research Service finding that the average number of migrant deaths per year rose from 200 in the early 1990s to 472 in 2005. Clinton also signed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act in 1996, which significantly increased the number of people eligible for deportation and made it harder for undocumented immigrants to obtain legal status. During the Obama administration, the number of unaccompanied minors arriving at the border surged, leading the administration to rush the construction of detention centers to hold families that had arrived illegally. One such facility, the Dilley Immigration Processing Center in Texas, has faced ongoing criticism over poor conditions and the detainment of children.

  • In 1994, the Clinton administration implemented the 'prevention through deterrence' immigration enforcement strategy.
  • In 1996, Clinton signed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act.
  • In 2014, the number of unaccompanied minors arriving at the border significantly increased under the Obama administration.

The players

Hillary Clinton

Former U.S. Secretary of State and 2016 Democratic presidential candidate.

Bill Clinton

Former President of the United States and Hillary Clinton's husband.

Barack Obama

Former President of the United States.

Donald Trump

Former President of the United States.

Joe Biden

Current President of the United States.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“More people were deported under my husband [Bill Clinton] and Barack Obama without killing American citizens and without putting children into detention camps than were in the first Trump term or this first year of Trump's second term.”

— Hillary Clinton (Munich Security Conference)

“I have friends, school, and family here in the United States. To this day, I don't know what we did wrong to be detained. I feel like I'll never get out of here. I just ask that you don't forget about us.”

— Gustavo Santiago, 13-year-old detainee (ProPublica)

What’s next

The Biden administration's continued use of Title 42 to expel migrants has faced criticism, with some arguing it has fueled a 'gold rush for human smugglers.' The legacy of past Democratic administrations' immigration policies remains a subject of debate as the 2024 election approaches.

The takeaway

While the Trump administration's immigration policies were widely condemned as cruel and inhumane, a closer examination of the historical record shows that Democratic presidents have also implemented harsh enforcement measures that have had serious consequences for migrants, including increased deaths and family separations. This complex legacy complicates the narrative around which party has a more 'humane' approach to immigration.