- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Fairfield Today
By the People, for the People
Fairfield Resident Challenges City's Handling of Unlawful Assessment Fees
Letter urges broader refunds and scrutiny of other districts after appellate court ruling
Apr. 17, 2026 at 10:40pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The financial and legal fallout from Fairfield's unlawful assessment fees casts a long shadow over City Hall.Fairfield TodayA Fairfield resident whose lawsuit led to an appellate court ruling that the city unlawfully raised assessment fees is now pressing city leaders to take more comprehensive action, including refunding four years of fees to affected property owners. In a sharply worded letter, David Thacker argues the city's legal exposure extends beyond the single district at issue in his case and warns that failing to act decisively could invite further litigation.
Why it matters
The city of Fairfield is facing significant financial pressure, with an $11.1 million structural deficit, as it grapples with how to address the court ruling on assessment fees. Thacker's letter challenges the city's approach and could force a more expansive and costly response, further straining the city's budget.
The details
Thacker's letter contends that many of Fairfield's other assessment districts may suffer from similar legal deficiencies, including noncompliance with Proposition 218 requirements. He strongly endorses refunding four years of assessments to affected property owners, directly countering staff warnings that such refunds could exceed $5 million. Thacker also criticizes the city's handling of legal guidance in prior years, noting discussions in 2019 and 2023 when concerns about compliance were dismissed.
- In 2019 and 2023, Fairfield city officials dismissed concerns about LLMD compliance.
- In a recent appellate court ruling, the city of Fairfield was found to have unlawfully raised assessment fees.
The players
David Thacker
A Fairfield resident whose lawsuit led to an appellate court ruling that the city unlawfully raised assessment fees.
Fairfield City Council
The city leaders who will decide how to address the court ruling and Thacker's letter at an upcoming meeting.
What they’re saying
“The assumption that no action be taken is a statement too far.”
— David Thacker, Fairfield Resident
“The money to be refunded never belonged to the city. Returning it is a legal obligation rather than a discretionary expense.”
— David Thacker, Fairfield Resident
What’s next
The Fairfield City Council is scheduled to meet on Tuesday to provide direction on how to address the court ruling and Thacker's letter, which could significantly impact the city's finances.
The takeaway
This case highlights the legal and financial challenges cities face when assessment fees are found to be unlawful, and the pressure they can experience from residents to take more comprehensive action to address the issue.

