True Crime Podcaster Speculates on Lack of Witnesses in Nancy Guthrie Case

Experts believe multiple accomplices were involved in the high-profile kidnapping.

Apr. 12, 2026 at 10:04pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

An extreme close-up photograph of a pair of handcuffs against a pitch-black background, lit by a harsh, direct camera flash, conceptually representing the high-stakes investigation into Nancy Guthrie's disappearance.The investigation into Nancy Guthrie's disappearance continues, with experts speculating on the complex dynamics that may be preventing witnesses from coming forward.Tucson Today

A true crime podcaster has offered his theory on why no witnesses have come forward in the ongoing investigation into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie from her Tucson, Arizona home three months ago. According to the podcaster, the lack of witnesses is likely due to fear of self-incrimination, as he believes multiple people were involved in the crime.

Why it matters

The Nancy Guthrie case has captivated the nation, with law enforcement and true crime enthusiasts alike searching for clues to uncover what happened to the missing woman. The lack of witnesses coming forward has been a major obstacle, and understanding the potential reasons behind this could aid the investigation.

The details

True crime podcaster Josh Diaz believes the reason no one has come forward with information is that multiple people were involved in Guthrie's kidnapping, and those accomplices are unwilling to turn on each other. "I think that it's more than one person involved in this, and I think the reason that nobody's come forward—and I think that, you know, two to three [suspects]—is that they can't do that without incriminating themselves," Diaz said in an interview. However, a former FBI agent suggested that if there were multiple people involved, someone likely would have betrayed the group for the reward money. Meanwhile, former Pima County Sheriff Kurt Dabb believes there are anywhere from two to four accomplices, citing the complexity of the crime.

  • Nancy Guthrie went missing from her Tucson, Arizona home three months ago.
  • The investigation into her disappearance is ongoing.

The players

Josh Diaz

A true crime podcaster who has speculated on the reasons behind the lack of witnesses in the Nancy Guthrie case.

Chris McDonough

A homicide detective who works with the Cold Case Foundation and was interviewed by Diaz.

Maureen O'Connell

A former FBI Special Agent who was interviewed in the same podcast as Diaz.

Kurt Dabb

A former Pima County sheriff who believes multiple accomplices were involved in the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“I think that it's more than one person involved in this, and I think the reason that nobody's come forward—and I think that, you know, two to three [suspects]—is that they can't do that without incriminating themselves.”

— Josh Diaz, True Crime Podcaster

“If there were multiple people involved, someone would have gone for the money and betrayed their fellow criminals.”

— Maureen O'Connell, Former FBI Special Agent

“I believe there are anywhere between two to four accomplices. The logistics of something of this magnitude is too much for one person to handle, in my professional opinion, based on the facts as I know them right now.”

— Kurt Dabb, Former Pima County Sheriff

What’s next

The investigation into Nancy Guthrie's disappearance continues, with law enforcement and true crime enthusiasts alike searching for any leads that could help locate the victim or identify the suspect(s) involved.

The takeaway

The lack of witnesses coming forward in the Nancy Guthrie case highlights the complex dynamics that can arise in high-profile crimes, where fear of self-incrimination or loyalty to accomplices may prevent people from providing crucial information to authorities.