Alaska Seeks Fairer Oil Revenue Share

Alaskans call for changes to oil tax policies to boost state revenue and public services

Mar. 16, 2026 at 10:49pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A letter to the editor in the Anchorage Daily News argues that Alaska needs to revisit its oil tax policies to ensure the state receives a fairer share of profits from fossil fuel production and sales. The author contends that the 2013 Senate Bill 21, which replaced the previous ACES tax system, has led to a significant drop in state revenue from oil, resulting in cuts to public services like education, infrastructure, and the state's ferry system.

Why it matters

Alaska's economy is heavily dependent on oil and gas revenue, which funds a significant portion of the state's budget and public services. The debate over oil taxation policies is an ongoing political issue, as the state seeks to balance the interests of the oil industry with the need to generate sufficient revenue to support Alaskans.

The details

The letter writer argues that under the previous ACES (Alaska's Clear and Equitable Share) tax system, the state collected over $19 billion in production taxes over a five-year period. However, after SB 21 was implemented in 2014, the state saw a minimum 30% drop in oil revenue over the next five years, leading to cuts in public services and programs. The author contends that the current system under SB 21 is not working, and that revisiting the state's oil tax policies would be a step towards restoring funding for essential public needs.

  • In 2013, Senate Bill 21 was passed and implemented in 2014, replacing the previous ACES tax system.
  • Under ACES, the state collected over $19 billion in production taxes over a five-year period.
  • After SB 21 was implemented, the state saw a minimum 30% drop in oil revenue over the next five years.

The players

John Blaine

A resident of Anchorage, Alaska, who wrote the letter to the editor.

John Sturgeon

The author of a previous commentary referenced in the letter, arguing against turning oil into the "next timber industry demise".

Sarah Palin

The former governor of Alaska during whose administration the ACES tax system was passed.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“SB 21 replaced ACES ('Alaska's Clear and Equitable Share'), passed during the Sarah Palin administration. In five years, ACES brought in $19 billion in production taxes. Then SB 21 was implemented. The next five years brought in zero in production taxes.”

— John Blaine, Anchorage resident

“Analyses of state income since SB 21 show a minimum 30% drop, which meant and means higher profits for oil producers.”

— John Blaine, Anchorage resident

What’s next

Legislators in Alaska are showing concern about the outcomes of SB 21 and are considering changes to the state's oil tax policies to ensure a fairer share of revenue for the state.

The takeaway

Alaska's reliance on oil and gas revenue to fund public services has led to an ongoing debate over the state's tax policies. The letter highlights the need for a balanced approach that supports the oil industry while also generating sufficient revenue to maintain essential public programs and infrastructure.