Seattle Professor Warns Iran Ground Invasion Risks Public Support

Schoettmer says US has largely accomplished military goals but warns of public backlash to prolonged conflict.

Apr. 1, 2026 at 9:19am

Patrick Schoettmer, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Seattle University, warned in an interview with Bloomberg that a prolonged ground invasion of Iran by the US could risk eroding public support, even as President Trump claimed the US had largely accomplished its military goals in the conflict and would leave it to other nations to resolve issues in the Strait of Hormuz.

Why it matters

The US-Iran conflict has been a major geopolitical flashpoint, with concerns about the potential for escalation and the impact on global energy markets. Schoettmer's comments suggest the US may be seeking to wind down direct military involvement, but cautions that public opinion could turn against the administration if the conflict drags on.

The details

In the interview, Schoettmer said that while the US had achieved its initial military objectives, a prolonged ground invasion of Iran could backfire politically. He noted that the American public has historically been wary of protracted conflicts, and that the administration would need to carefully manage public sentiment to maintain support for its actions.

  • President Trump said he foresaw ending the war on Iran within two to three weeks.

The players

Patrick Schoettmer

An Associate Professor of Political Science at Seattle University who spoke to Bloomberg about the US reaction to the Iran war.

President Donald Trump

The US President who claimed the US had largely accomplished its military goals in the conflict with Iran.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“A prolonged ground invasion of Iran could risk eroding public support, even as President Trump claimed the US had largely accomplished its military goals in the conflict.”

— Patrick Schoettmer, Associate Professor of Political Science

The takeaway

Schoettmer's warning highlights the delicate balance the US administration must strike between achieving its military objectives and maintaining public support for the conflict, as the American public has historically been wary of protracted wars.